[peel] Re: Steve Lowman Tapes - New Batch L041-L060, etc

[Alan Ford]

My thanks too, to Bill, SL, SW and all other contributors.
Re Oldfield; I seem to remember John playing the whole of Hergest Ridge.
Maybe that adds to the confusion.

Alan


On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:57 AM, steve <saipanda@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Many thanks to Bill and Steve Lowman - as well as all other rippers and
> those responsible for getting details up on the wiki (only occasionally me,
> in fact).
>
> As a first step this time, have opened up all the tape pages - including
> the tracklisting insets (should be very useful for dating shows). Links
> here:
>
> http://peel.wikia.com/wiki/SL_Tapes_%28tapes%29
>
> The main task now is to ID the shows the tracks are from. Steve TK has
> already done the first (T040). At least for starters, it would be really
> helpful if people could add at least the dates of the shows (if you can
> work them out) on the tape pages. Just click on the "Edit" tab, fill in the
> date and press "Publish". Don't worry about style or anything.
>
> There are some mix-tapes and non-Peel shows in there, so would be good to
> have these at least marked as such (don't worry about dates).
>
> On other matters, sounds like Bill's new In Concert reel is the 30 Nov
> 1971 show (many thanks to Ken's book!). As yet unshared, so would be good
> to hear that.
>
> Also back to the 70s - thought the new Mike Oldfield doc on TheSpace was
> quite interesting. Oldfield and Branson stuck to the line that the whole
> Tubular Bells album was played in full on its release, but the audio seemed
> to suggest Ken might be right and it was only the first side. At least, the
> show clip they had only featured Peel's intro/outro for side 1. Be
> interested to know where the clip was from. Maybe the whole show is out
> there somewhere.
>
> Many thanks also to Paul for listing up the record collection details for
> each letter both here and on the wiki.
>
> On Mark's point about running out of records for any of the letters - I'm
> guessing X might be a bit tricky, although there's a few obvious ones.
>
> Cheers,
>
> SW
>
>  
>