Pete Townsend "John Peel" Lecture

[steve]

Poll results over at #keepingitpeel on who should do next one (if there is another):

http://keepingitpeel.wordpress.com/2011/11/04/poll-the-next-john-peel-lecture/

Not such a bad choice, but did like the idea of MES...

SW

--- In peel@yahoogroups.com, MARK LUETCHFORD <M.Luetchford@...> wrote:
>
> surely it has to be Mark E Smith ... no contest
> 
> 
> From: steve <saipanda@...>
> To: peel@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, 5 November 2011, 8:41
> Subject: [peel] Re: Pete Townsend "John Peel" Lecture
> 
> 
> Â  
> Poll over at #keepingitpeel on who should give next year's Peel lecture (if there is one):
> 
> http://keepingitpeel.wordpress.com/2011/11/04/poll-the-next-john-peel-lecture/
> 
> Open for the next week.
> 
> SW
> 
> --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, RobF <robfleay@> wrote:
> >
> > Further critique here from Chris TT
> > http://christt.com/words/pete-townshends-john-peel-lecture/
> > 
> > It did seem a bit wrong that Townshend spent so much time focussing on "the
> > biz" as this was clearly of the least interest to Peel
> > 
> > On 1 November 2011 20:48, MARK LUETCHFORD <M.Luetchford@>wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > I thought quite thoughtful and showed an understanding of what Peel was
> > > about but am prepared to be shot down in flames
> > >
> > > *From:* steve <saipanda@>
> > > *To:* peel@yahoogroups.com
> > > *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 November 2011, 15:12
> > > *Subject:* [peel] Re: Pete Townsend "John Peel" Lecture
> > >
> > >
> > > Full text is on the Guardian site:
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/01/pete-townshend-john-peel-lecture?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487
> > >
> > > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, RobF <robfleay@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone listened to this in full?
> > > >
> > > > The BBC review doesn't give me great hope (not that I had much anyway).
> > > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15528101
> > > >
> > > > he gets ripped to shreds here
> > > >
> > > http://xrrf.blogspot.com/2011/11/john-peel-lecture-technology-is-bad.html
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>