At Last The 2000 Show

isector100 paul4epbev@...
Thu Sep 16 19:57:06 CEST 2010


More than happy to help where I can!

--- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "Stuart" <stuartb@...> wrote:
>
> Yes I'm hoping that when iSector has filled in the gaps in the 1991-1993 period, he still has the motivation to provide upgrades to many of the pre-existing shows from that period, which run very muffled for 45 minutes at at time (auto-reverse cassette deck?). At least the tracklisting task is not so great for sound upgrades....
> Stuart
> 
>  
> 
> --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "Humphrey" <thebarguest@> wrote:
> >
> > No, Stuart, I love the old shows you've done - thanks again ! I guess I was just trying to say, clumsily, that if anyone feels that they have an upgrade to an existing show, please upload. I'm sure there's room in the Wiki (infinite capacity ?) for alternate/multiple versions. And personally, colds aside, a good barometer of a show's quality is good ol' Peely's voice ...
> > 
> > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "Stuart" <stuartb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I find that JP's voice is very sensitive to slight changes in recording distortion, reception, tonal balance, speed errors, whether he has a cold, is up or down......
> > > 
> > > And yes I can hear a strange roughness to the recording, and slightly cut off in the treble. I've not listened very closely but it might be due to being recorded on a portable cassette recorder (was anyone still using them in 2000?) or was streamed from a Listen Again webpage (had that started in 2000?).
> > > 
> > > I somehow don't think you will like the 400 Box show I'm ripping at the moment, as it is AM mono, with very strong night time reception fading and distortion, yet I am enjoying it very much as I know it is likely to be the only version of that show I will ever hear.
> > > 
> > > I personally prefer the sound of http://peel.wikia.com/wiki/Peel_Late_Sep_-_Oct_1983 but I would say that.....
> > > 
> > > Stuart
> > > 
> > > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "Humphrey" <thebarguest@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Compare Peely's voice in this Jan 2000 show with his voice in the recent very-good-quality FM show of 91-11-17 ....
> > > > 
> > > > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "So It Goes 2512" <so_it_goes_2512@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Humphrey
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks for your honest evaluation. However, with all due respect also, I have to say that it sounds just fine to me (have you listened to the whole show?), and it is in stereo, which I don't think is something they ever managed to do on AM.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best wishes
> > > > > Steve [TK]
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "Humphrey" <thebarguest@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > THANKS very much to Steve and the tapers. However, WITH RESPECT, the Jan 2000 sound quality doesn't sound like FM (listen to Peely's voice)- maybe it's a good AM recording .. Maybe the FM was not tuned-in properly ? .. Anyway, if anyone has an upgrade (hi Andrew !), I'd love to hear it - after all, this is a vital all-time FF show ! Sorry if I've offended anyone, it's certainly NOT my intention.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Regrads,
> > > > > > Mr Finicky
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "So It Goes 2512" <so_it_goes_2512@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fellow Peelites
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 1) Show date: 04 January 2000
> > > > > > > Sessions: none. Peelenium 1992, All-Time FF 50-46
> > > > > > > Wiki: http://peel.wikia.com/wiki/04_January_2000
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2) Show date: 15 September 1996 (BFBS)
> > > > > > > Wiki: http://peel.wikia.com/wiki/15_September_1996_%28BFBS%29
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Many thanks to both tapers. It is a good day for Peel shows indeed as I'm sure you'll agree.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Best wishes
> > > > > > > Steve [TK]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>






More information about the Peel mailing list