Common Peel show shared file date errors

[dissolvedpaul]

Hi Ken, thanks so much for your reply. I can definitely confirm after
listening to the file 23091994 again that it's the second Trumans
water session being repeated as the track "girler too" is played.He
also clearly identifies the trumans session track "death to dead
things" after playing the last track from the Luke slater session
"Soup". It's an incomplete file but there is certainly a great chunk
of the show there with no edits. Directly after "Girler too" John
plays a track by Spacetime continuum called 'Drift' from an album on
Sauce records called "Fluorescence". After that, he reads out a letter
from the band "I'm being good" and mentions that they have a
forthcoming session on the program too (which was on the 21/10/1994
according to your most wonderful book.) which would tie up nicely this
show date nicely. I was rather confused with this initially myself
when trying to put a date on this "unknown" file because you would
have thought they would have simply repeated the 3rd trumans water
session from 94 earlier in that year and not the 93 session. John
clearly states before "death to dead things" that Dreadzone and smudge
are in session the next day too which would be the 24/09/94. This made
me 100% sure of my dating.  Anyway, I hope that's helpful. Regards,
Paul.  

--- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "ken garner" <ken_garner@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Paul, I don't think I have those audio files myself, but what 
> you say all stacks up and sound plausible: in my experience doing the 
> book and the one before, entire shows and sessions sometimes swap 
> years out there. Just one query, and I want to check this because it 
> might be a mistake in the book, you say the Trumanswater repeat on 
> Friday 23/9/94 with Luke Slater is of their second session, first TX 
> on 5/11/93. But both Jon Small's peelsessions.co.uk original site and 
> I (from session sheets) had this show as repeating their third and 
> last session, the one 1st TX on 17/6/94. But we could be wrong. Are 
> the track titles on the audio file identifiable? Thanks - kg
> 
> PS. Company 2: 1st TX date in IST given correctly as 20/9/89. Date 
> also correct in shows index in new book. Was also correct in old data 
> file as retrieved from floppies. Why then, as I have only just 
> noticed, is it in incorrectly as 20/9/90 in the new Sessionography? 
> Argh! Apologies.
> 
> --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "dissolvedpaul" <Dissolvedpaul@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi. I've recently rectified some glaring error's in quite a few peel
> > Radio 1 peel show dates that have been shared for ages now, and are
> > still included in the torrent packs (most notably pack 8) and on 
> many
> > peel sites so it looks like no one has pointed out these dates are
> > wrong yet. 
> > 
> > There are so few shows shared from these early 90's dates anyway,it
> > wasn't hard to quickly fix them. Ok, here goes. 
> > 
> > I shall list what the files are currently named as and then what 
> they
> > actually should be dated as. I'm sure all of you will most likely 
> have
> > these files so you should be able to recognise them in your folders
> > immediately. 
> > 
> > The file named JP Feb 89 running at 46.55 secs is actually from
> > 11071990 with happy flowers in session. 
> > 
> > The file under John Peel 1991 Extracts running at 35.10 secs is from
> > 1992 over two nights, 04 and 05 January 92 with leatherface and Hole
> > in session. 
> > 
> > The file under John Peel 1992 Extracts running at 47.29 secs is from
> > 190393 with New fast automatic daffodils in session. 
> > 
> > The file under John Peel 1991-03-22 running at 51.57 secs is 
> actually
> > from 1996. 032296 
> > 
> > There are 2 very commonly shared files under "unknown" and they are
> > Mid 90's Part 2 128k and John Peel Part 2 Unknown mid 90's. Both are
> > exactly the same file running at 79.14 secs and the actual file is
> > from 23091994 with Luke Slater's 7th plane and a repeat of the 
> Trumans
> > Water session from 051193. 
> > 
> > Anyway, hope that's helpful to someone if someone would like to pass
> > on this info. As I stated in a previous post, it would be great to 
> get
> > some more of these missing 90 shows out there as there are such
> > enormous gaps in the archive. Even track lists would be most welcome
> > for any of the shows I previously asked about. 
> > Thanks a lot, Paul.
> >
>