[peel] Re: Peel Headstone

[michael stoecker]

What an unnecessary point to argue. I just feel sorry for Mr. Henderson. I shudder to think that his life might be as joyless as his writing. Or worse yet, that his friends and family have to endure such insipid drivel all the time.





To: peel@yahoogroups.com
From: ken_garner@...
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:04:06 +0000
Subject: [peel] Re: Peel Headstone
















  


    
            

This is the offending column, by Michael Henderson, in Saturday's 

edition:



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?

xml=/opinion/2008/02/16/do1603.xml



I was tempted to write but what's the point



k



--- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "grang354" <colin_ellis@...> wrote:

>

> And here's a piece from the Torygraph, which provoked a response 

from a 

> fogeyish leader writer:

> 

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?

> xml=/news/2008/02/13/npeel113.xml

> 

> 

> --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "Rob Brewer" <lists@> wrote:

> >

> > On Feb 12, 2008 3:18 PM, Julian Porter <spiggytopes55@> wrote:

> > >

> > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7240623.stm

> > 

> > There's a picture here:

> > 

> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/norfolkodyssey/2223211584/

> > 

> > Of *course* someone's left a demo for him.

> > 

> > 

> > -- 

> > Rob Brewer rob@ http://www.rbrwr.org

> > "The [central limit theorem] would have been personified by the 

Greeks

> > and deified, if they had known of it." -- Francis Galton

> >

>