[peel] What actually happened in the first Festive 50 of 1976?

Jimmy Stepek jimmystep@...
Sun Aug 31 14:15:16 CEST 2008


Ken, 
I just noted a slight error in the scan "peelPasB19761227". The date they have given for the Mady Prior & June Tabor session is 23/09/1976 when I would think it should be 1975 as the session I have was broadcast on 20/10/75.
Cheers....Jimmy


--- On Sun, 31/8/08, ken garner <ken_garner@yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: ken garner <ken_garner@...>
> Subject: [peel] What actually happened in the first Festive 50 of 1976?
> To: peel@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, 31 August, 2008, 11:52 AM
> I have just uploaded pdf scans of the full scripts (PasBs)
> for the 6 (not 5) relevant shows to 
> the files section of this group's site. These should
> answer most of 'rushomancy''s long list 
> of questions! As I say over there, "To resolve
> debates, and as a thank-you (from me) to 
> the members of this group who contributed so much to the
> correcting of BBC archive data 
> over recent months and years, here (for a limited time
> only) are the full details of what 
> Peel actually played on the radio on six shows from
> 24/12/76 to 3/1/77 in the first 
> Festive 50. One obvious forgotten detail is that several of
> these shows were extended to 
> two hours, anticipating a permanent change at Easter
> 1977." I also noticed with horror 
> that, contrary to the shows index in my book, and what my
> original notes back in 1992 
> said, that the F50 actually started a show earlier, on
> Christmas Eve, and he did indeed play 
> the first 6 records, including Yes! I have no idea how I
> missed that 16 years ago. 
> Apologies. These also serve as good examples of Peel PasBs
> at their best: legible, 
> complete, reliable. This period only lasted from the mid
> 70s through to the late 80s. 
> Earlier ones are sometimes incomplete or simply illegible,
> black and blotchy, when printed 
> from the negative on microfilm at archives. And before
> anyone gets too excited, this is 
> the only Festive 50 for which I actually have the hard
> copies of the scripts (the rest I read 
> on screen only). The BBC charges a whopping fee per page
> for external organisations who 
> ask for these scripts to be printed out, so I am at risk of
> breaking BBC copyright here. But, 
> on the other hand, these are past the 30 year rule, were
> printed out and paid for internally 
> as part of the production of In Session Tonight back in
> 92-93, and I would argue are the 
> least the BBC can do for the sterling efforts of this group
> to properly document the legend 
> that is etc. Still, to be on the safe side, I shall only
> leave them up on the site for a month, 
> and will delete this post from the online archive after 2
> weeks, ok? Enjoy! For use strictly 
> for information and not graphic illumination of any
> bootlegs... NB. Note how records 
> played that are singles, all the info is the first main
> column. The main oddities here, it 
> seems to me, are the Hendrix tracks, whose discographical
> info given I do not understand: 
> but then wasn't there a big copyright spat about
> Hendrix all through the 70s??
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

      




More information about the Peel mailing list