Tape 1
saipanda
saipanda@...
Tue Aug 12 21:34:42 CEST 2008
Sorry, I seem to have misread your original message.
In my previous answer I was thinking the next show was on part of tape 1, two parts on
tape 2 and one part on tape 3. Don't know where I got that from.
Must be the exhaustion!
Anyway, if I have got it right now, think the solution for the first show is to add
appropriate links, comments, info on the Tape 2 page, the 7 July 1978 page, and the 400
Box main page.
Will do this when I get up.
Cheers,
Steve
--- In peel@yahoogroups.com, rockerq@... wrote:
>
> Here lies the problem with numbering the tapes - this show is actually spread
> over "tape1" and most of "tape 2" - so the audio is in 4 sections. I am
> pleased you did not notice my edits! - there are therefore three places where a
> varying amount of time has been lost - eg The middle of the Dick Gaughan track,
> the end of the Dire Straits track - the gap could be as short as 5 seconds if
> he was "watching the reel as it comes to a close" - or could be a few minutes
> if he didn't like the track playing, or more if he'd gone to the pub!
>
> The first tape definitely sounds fast, but as you say the second tape is even
> faster - Either he has 2 machines (unlikely as he then would have allowed the
> sections to overlap) - or the second tape was unevenly wound and thus running
> slower - which reinforces our theory that he was using one of those crap mono
> cassette decks that we all got for Christmas in the mid-70s - after a year or
> two the motors would start to wear out. Also posssible that the batteries
> were running out - although in that case you'd expect the speeding up to occur
> gradually throughout the show, rather than one tape faster than the other.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Rocker
>
>
> > <<Has anyone else noticed that this show (7/7/78) seems to run a bit fast?
> > I slowed it down by 2.5% using Audacity, but noticed that after about 1
> > hour it seems to speed up again.
> > Presumably the tape is a C120, so maybe it speeds up after the tape flip.
> > From 1:03.44 (the Dick G back-announce) to the end I've slowed it by a
> > further 2.5%
> > I'm listening again now and it's still not perfect, but sounds much better
> > to my cloth ears.
> >
> > Presumably the original show was two hours.
> > The 10:25 timecheck comes after 14 mins, so there's 11 mins missing from
> > the beginning of the show.
> > The final pips come at 1:44
> > 1:44 + 11 = 1:55
> > Unless my logic/maths are flawed (surely not), there's still another 5 mins
> > missing.
> > Surely it's not running that fast!?
> >
> > Alan>>
>
More information about the Peel
mailing list