Lossy and Lossless Audio compression
deedeeramain
deedeeramain@...
Wed Nov 28 16:44:36 CET 2007
I see the advantages of FLAC and think I need to reconsider my
archiving system.
I rip my CDs using Easy CD-DA and convert to Ogg Vorbis. The
settings in Easy CD-DA give you the usual compression options and
the best (ie most minimum compression) is labelled 320-500kbps hence
the 500kbps that was confusing some of us.
Ogg Vorbis (.ogg) was supposed to be similar to .mp3 but open source
and slightly superior tho. I confess I could not tell the difference
between two files ripped with the different codecs!
Now, memory is less of a concern so I guess I need to trade up to a
lossless form of compression but why FLAC? A majority of the files I
see floating around with lossless compression are Monkey's Audio
Compression (.ape) files.
Maybe FLAC is superior but so was OGG and it (OGG) seems to be
falling by the wayside a la betamax!
Anybody have any convincing arguments for one or the other?
Cheers!
DeeDee
More information about the Peel
mailing list