From stuartb@... Sat Jun 1 03:00:34 2019 From: stuartb@... (Stuart Brooks) Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2019 02:00:34 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: That was a reference to JP's comments in one of the BFBS shows after a particularly minor key minimal synth track! That period was certainly peak Peel to me On 31 May 2019 22:16:32 BST, "thebarguest@... [peel]" wrote: >"Dark and gloomy" early 80's ? They were very good years for me and the >music was pretty good, esp. 1980 to 83. The Feb 81 Berlin Eddie Tapes >are brilliant listening, with John talking more than usual, amusing and >interesting, God bless him... From thebarguest@... Sat Jun 1 11:04:48 2019 From: thebarguest@... (thebarguest@...) Date: 01 Jun 2019 09:04:48 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ah, ha ha ! Thanks for the explanation. Yes, peak Peel for me was 77-ish to 82-ish, it's probably an age thing. I have been enjoying listening to other show up to the early 2000's, there was more musical variety with the later shows, but less "gold nuggets" like Clash, Banshees, Joy Division etc.. I don't always agree with Peely's opinions eg in a recent Berlin Eddie show from Feb 81, he said he prefers the original (very basic, skeletal) version of "Wrong Em Boyo" to the Clash version !! From timgiebel@... Sun Jun 2 12:18:10 2019 From: timgiebel@... (Tim Giebel-Inanloo) Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 10:18:10 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, Message-ID: So I have now digitised and uploaded all the tapes Kev sent me, these were several shows from 68, 69, and the top gear fifth anniversary show from 1972. Thanks to whoever fandomised these :) I have started digitising the other small batch of tapes I got a few weeks ago, which are edited shows from the early 90s. On 29 May 2019, at 01:59, johnpeel3904@yahoo.co.uk [peel] > wrote: I believe they were shared on some blog sites 10 years ago, but the links to the files to download were never shared on the Peel Wiki site. Most of those files were unfortunately on file sharing sites like Rapidshare or Megaupload, where both services have seen been closed down. From thebarguest@... Sun Jun 2 22:36:30 2019 From: thebarguest@... (thebarguest@...) Date: 02 Jun 2019 20:36:30 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, Message-ID: Many thanks, Tim ! I'm listening to the 1972 show now, and it's really good quality, amazing to think it's nearly 47 years old ! Nice music as well... From thebarguest@... Mon Jun 3 17:44:56 2019 From: thebarguest@... (thebarguest@...) Date: 03 Jun 2019 15:44:56 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, Message-ID: Many thanks to Kevin as well as Tim, of course. It is heart-warming that "new", good-quality Peel tapes from the 70's are being shared ! As Rod the Mod proclaimed many years ago - "Never a Dull Moment" ! From kevhkrow@... Mon Jun 3 19:28:25 2019 From: kevhkrow@... (Kev Hunter) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 17:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates References: <942088037.16198207.1559582905776.ref@...> Message-ID: <942088037.16198207.1559582905776@...> Thanks to Tim for digitizing the tapes I sent him, and also thanks to whoever did the Fandom pages for the shows concerned.A bit of info to add / correct on the 26th May 1968 programme:  all four of the Mike Stuart Span session tracks were included on the the official "Timespan" CD (Wooden Hill, WHCD003) released in 1996.I contacted all members of the band in 1989: their vocalist was Stuart Hobday who later became a BBC radio producer, notably on "Sounds Of The Sixties" in the late 80s/early 90s.Their session is unusual, I think, insofar as Peel makes no comment about them or the music other than factual stuff (ie that they were covering Tomorrow's "My White Bicycle", etc) - which makes me wonder if he wasn't that keen on them?  Can't remember any other session where he has been so indifferent towards a session. From colin_ellis@... Tue Jun 4 10:41:21 2019 From: colin_ellis@... (colin_ellis@...) Date: 04 Jun 2019 01:41:21 -0700 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: <942088037.16198207.1559582905776@...> References: <942088037.16198207.1559582905776.ref@...> <942088037.16198207.1559582905776@...> Message-ID: I think they were booked for a Peel session because they'd signed for Elektra and had re-named themselves Leviathan, a very late 1960s name (like heavy, man) - and of course Peel liked a lot of the music Elektra put out. Maybe he wanted to encourage them, hoped for something good but was a bit underwhelmed by the results? From kevhkrow@... Tue Jun 4 14:20:31 2019 From: kevhkrow@... (Kev Hunter) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates References: <618979336.16781123.1559650831247.ref@...> Message-ID: <618979336.16781123.1559650831247@...> At that point, Elektra (and Clive Selwood, who later was to work with Peel and the Dandelion label) weren't even in the picture and wouldn't be until the end of 1968, so I think we can discount that. Maybe it was just that Peel had seen the band live and wasn't as impressed by their studio session.  It was fairly unusual of him not to make any comment about the performances. From colin_ellis@... Tue Jun 4 15:38:52 2019 From: colin_ellis@... (colin_ellis@...) Date: 04 Jun 2019 06:38:52 -0700 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: <618979336.16781123.1559650831247@...> References: <618979336.16781123.1559650831247.ref@...> <618979336.16781123.1559650831247@...> Message-ID: Kev, you'll certainly know more than I do about them. I just remember the band being mentioned in some of the Elektra "appreciation society" newsletters I subscribed to in '68 and '69 as a new signing to the label who were about to record.. But weren't they the subject of a TV documentary (as the Mike Stuart Span) around then? They seemed to get a few music press write-ups too, so maybe Peel (or Bernie Andrews) saw them live and/or booked them as a result of that. From kevhkrow@... Tue Jun 4 16:16:45 2019 From: kevhkrow@... (Kev Hunter) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates References: <1575144321.16887614.1559657805582.ref@...> Message-ID: <1575144321.16887614.1559657805582@...> You're right Colin, the band were one of the subjects of BBC's excellent "A Year In The Life" documentary series which was first aired in September 1969 (and was shown again in 1989 and 1991). Worth watching ! From timgiebel@... Wed Jun 5 18:06:43 2019 From: timgiebel@... (Tim Giebel-Inanloo) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:06:43 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, , Message-ID: Hi everyone, something I forgot to mention is that a few months back I came across three tapes of John Peel’s home truths radio 4 program, and was wondering whether people want me to upload these also? There is also a recording of a tribute show to John after his passing. Tim On 2 Jun 2019, at 21:37, thebarguest@yahoo.co.uk [peel] > wrote: Many thanks, Tim ! I'm listening to the 1972 show now, and it's really good quality, amazing to think it's nearly 47 years old ! Nice music as well... From so_it_goes_2512@... Wed Jun 5 18:22:42 2019 From: so_it_goes_2512@... (so_it_goes_2512@...) Date: 05 Jun 2019 09:22:42 -0700 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, , Message-ID: Hi Tim, yes please! There are recordings from 2003 to 2004, but these are web rips so yours may be better quality. Additionally, anything from 1998 to 2002 will most likely be new to the catalogue. Look forward to them! Best wishes, Steve (TK) From timgiebel@... Wed Jun 5 19:05:11 2019 From: timgiebel@... (Tim Giebel-Inanloo) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 17:05:11 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, , , Message-ID: No problem Steve, will do. I have a feeling these shows are mainly from around 1999 On 5 Jun 2019, at 17:30, so_it_goes_2512@yahoo.co.uk [peel] > wrote: Hi Tim, yes please! There are recordings from 2003 to 2004, but these are web rips so yours may be better quality. Additionally, anything from 1998 to 2002 will most likely be new to the catalogue. Look forward to them! Best wishes, Steve (TK) From webbiewebbster@... Wed Jun 5 23:45:52 2019 From: webbiewebbster@... (webbiewebbster@...) Date: 05 Jun 2019 21:45:52 +0000 Subject: 31st July 1978 show Message-ID: Hello Rocker - Do you (or anyone else) still have the file for this show ? Could you reupload ? Cheers. https://peel.fandom.com/wiki/31_July_1978 https://peel.fandom.com/wiki/31_July_1978 From numbernine@... Thu Jun 6 03:06:54 2019 From: numbernine@... (Patrick Kimura-Macke) Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 02:06:54 +0100 Subject: JIMMY STEVENS FILE UPLOADED TO MOO Message-ID: <1256CCBA-1DD0-4B0F-8053-E0E75F769935@...> Dear Stuart I recently up loaded a file of three Jimmy Stevens tracks to the Moo (John Leonhard's Dad). One track is followed by a comment from John so I am sure they are from a Peel show. I do not know the dates, they do not match the Wiki info that is already existing. They are from several different mixed tapes I have. They have probably been rerecorded (cassette tape player to cassette tape player) since originally recorded. I'm sure many of the other tracks on these tapes are from John's show as well as the other Radio One presenters in the seventies. Patrick Kimura-Macke From so_it_goes_2512@... Thu Jun 6 12:30:46 2019 From: so_it_goes_2512@... (so_it_goes_2512@...) Date: 06 Jun 2019 10:30:46 +0000 Subject: 31st July 1978 show In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Webbie Done! Enjoy. Best wishes Steve (TK) From so_it_goes_2512@... Thu Jun 6 14:01:50 2019 From: so_it_goes_2512@... (so_it_goes_2512@...) Date: 06 Jun 2019 12:01:50 +0000 Subject: Perfumed Garden 06 August 1967: new material Message-ID: Hi everyone A recent discussion about John's absence the night before the final PG show led me to unearth a recording I've had for ages (originally shared by Azanorak) which contains an hour of tuning around the dial finding in the course of it R355 and its final closing down, Radio Caroline and AFN. However, it also hid some previously unshared material from 06 August which I have extracted and uploaded as a new file, bits and pieces from the first hour of the show. Find it here https://peel.fandom.com/wiki/06_August_1967 complete with track listing. Best wishes Steve (TK) P.S. If anybody wants the original unedited file, let me know. From webbiewebbster@... Thu Jun 6 17:47:46 2019 From: webbiewebbster@... (webbiewebbster@...) Date: 06 Jun 2019 15:47:46 +0000 Subject: 31st July 1978 show In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Steve, appreciated. From stuartb@... Thu Jun 6 18:36:31 2019 From: stuartb@... (Stuart Brooks) Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 17:36:31 +0100 Subject: [peel] JIMMY STEVENS FILE UPLOADED TO MOO In-Reply-To: <1256CCBA-1DD0-4B0F-8053-E0E75F769935@...> References: <1256CCBA-1DD0-4B0F-8053-E0E75F769935@...> Message-ID: Thanks for that Patrick. Would be good to hear the rest of the tapes too and see if we can ID the shows they came from. From: Patrick Kimura-Macke numbernine@... [peel] Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 2:06 AM To: stuartb@... [peel] Subject: [peel] JIMMY STEVENS FILE UPLOADED TO MOO Dear Stuart I recently up loaded a file of three Jimmy Stevens tracks to the Moo (John Leonhard's Dad). One track is followed by a comment from John so I am sure they are from a Peel show. I do not know the dates, they do not match the Wiki info that is already existing. They are from several different mixed tapes I have. They have probably been rerecorded (cassette tape player to cassette tape player) since originally recorded. I'm sure many of the other tracks on these tapes are from John's show as well as the other Radio One presenters in the seventies. Patrick Kimura-Macke --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From M.Luetchford@... Thu Jun 6 18:57:45 2019 From: M.Luetchford@... (m.luetchford) Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 17:57:45 +0100 Subject: [peel] Perfumed Garden 06 August 1967: new material Message-ID: sounds like a gem that deserves to see the light of day. i like to mix my metaphors and similes. thanksSent from my Samsung device -------- Original message -------- From: "so_it_goes_2512@yahoo.co.uk [peel]" Date: 06/06/2019 13:01 (GMT+00:00) To: peel@yahoogroups.com Subject: [peel] Perfumed Garden 06 August 1967: new material   Hi everyoneA recent discussion about John's absence the night before the final PG show led me to unearth a recording I've had for ages (originally shared by Azanorak) which contains an hour of tuning around the dial finding in the course of it R355 and its final closing down, Radio Caroline and AFN. However, it also hid some previously unshared material from 06 August which I have extracted and uploaded as a new file, bits and pieces from the first hour of the show. Find it here complete with track listing.Best wishesSteve (TK)P.S. If anybody wants the original unedited file, let me know. From johnpeel3904@... Fri Jun 7 19:03:26 2019 From: johnpeel3904@... (johnpeel3904@...) Date: 07 Jun 2019 17:03:26 +0000 Subject: JIMMY STEVENS FILE UPLOADED TO MOO In-Reply-To: References: <1256CCBA-1DD0-4B0F-8053-E0E75F769935@...> Message-ID: The audio actually consists of three out of four session tracks from Jimmy Stevens. The way the tracks are played in order, suggests its more likely to come from 06 December 1973 https://peel.fandom.com/wiki/06_December_1973, rather than a repeat from 3rd January 1974. From iceage01@... Tue Jun 11 00:26:16 2019 From: iceage01@... (iceage01@...) Date: 10 Jun 2019 22:26:16 +0000 Subject: Completing BFBS 22/10/93 Message-ID: Just started managing my tapes again after reconditioning my computer and tape deck. Found a complete show of 22/10/93 and the quality is similar to the Max-dat file in MOOO server. So I downloaded the Max dat file and fill back those few missing minutes (between Superchunk and Boyracer). So I've downloaded the file and fill back those minutes from my tape to make a complete show. The rest of the file is from the original Dat_036. CK From iceage01@... Tue Jun 11 00:27:13 2019 From: iceage01@... (iceage01@...) Date: 10 Jun 2019 22:27:13 +0000 Subject: Completing BFBS 22/10/93 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Oh forgot to put the link: http://mooo.peelwiki.com/dl/max-dat/Updates/Dat_036_JP_BFBS-931022%20(rev).mp3 http://mooo.peelwiki.com/dl/max-dat/Updates/Dat_036_JP_BFBS-931022%20(rev).mp3 CK From keldridge@... Tue Jun 11 12:29:29 2019 From: keldridge@... (keldridge@...) Date: 11 Jun 2019 10:29:29 +0000 Subject: [peel] Perfumed Garden 06 August 1967: new material In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The 1964 file is password protected. What is the password ? Thanks From keldridge@... Tue Jun 11 14:52:27 2019 From: keldridge@... (keldridge@...) Date: 11 Jun 2019 05:52:27 -0700 Subject: SHOWS MISSING ? CAN I HELP ? Message-ID: There are quite a few shows missing when you can on a link to them. After all a lot of them went up over 10 years ago. I think I downloaded every one from 1967 - 1981 ( possibly 84 ). Except of course the one's that have had dead links for quite some time. Does anyone have any requests and I'll have a look and see if I have the show ? From stuartb@... Tue Jun 11 22:34:56 2019 From: stuartb@... (Stuart Brooks) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:34:56 +0100 Subject: [peel] Perfumed Garden 06 August 1967: new material In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Which 1964 file? On 11/06/2019 11:29, keldridge@... [peel] wrote: > > The 1964 file is password protected. What is the password ? Thanks > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From johnpeel3904@... Wed Jun 12 00:22:51 2019 From: johnpeel3904@... (johnpeel3904@...) Date: 11 Jun 2019 15:22:51 -0700 Subject: [peel] Perfumed Garden 06 August 1967: new material In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Well if there was a 1964 show in existence (Peel was then called John Ravenscroft and living and working as a DJ on an American radio station) featuring Peel, I would love to hear that !! From johnpeel3904@... Wed Jun 12 00:27:55 2019 From: johnpeel3904@... (johnpeel3904@...) Date: 11 Jun 2019 22:27:55 +0000 Subject: SHOWS MISSING ? CAN I HELP ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: There are some Radio London shows in 1967 that don't have links to download on the Peel Fandom site. Those are 01 July 1967, 17 July 1967 and 07 August 1967. From simond.phillips@... Wed Jun 12 09:33:00 2019 From: simond.phillips@... (simond.phillips@...) Date: 12 Jun 2019 07:33:00 +0000 Subject: SHOWS MISSING ? CAN I HELP ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Seconded! I'm so grateful to this site for giving me such wonderful recordings of the great JP in, what are for me, his prime years 1967-1970. But I do find the Wikia a little difficult to navigate so I'm never quite sure if have everything that circulates from that period. Does anyone have it as a single list anywhere please? Thanks for all the great work, guys! From dan54321@... Wed Jun 12 12:44:19 2019 From: dan54321@... (Dan) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:44:19 +0100 Subject: [peel] Perfumed Garden 06 August 1967: new material In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5D00D783.4060401@...> I don't know of a 1964 show, but I feel I should draw your attention to this 1961 show which is quite likely his first ever time on radio. https://peel.fandom.com/wiki/Kat%27s_Karavan_(1961) I find the wiki so hard to navigate that I had to find this with Google and even then it took several attempts. johnpeel3904@... [peel] wrote: > > > Well if there was a 1964 show in existence (Peel was then called John > Ravenscroft and living and working as a DJ on an American radio > station) featuring Peel, I would love to hear that !! > > From stuartb@... Wed Jun 12 13:24:50 2019 From: stuartb@... (Stuart Brooks) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:24:50 +0100 Subject: [peel] Perfumed Garden 06 August 1967: new material In-Reply-To: <5D00D783.4060401@...> References: <5D00D783.4060401@...> Message-ID: I just did a search for 1961 and it came up! Also on the 1961 page On 12 June 2019 11:44:19 BST, "Dan dan54321@... [peel]" wrote: >I don't know of a 1964 show, but I feel I should draw your attention to > >this 1961 show which is quite likely his first ever time on radio. >https://peel.fandom.com/wiki/Kat%27s_Karavan_(1961) > >I find the wiki so hard to navigate that I had to find this with Google > >and even then it took several attempts. > >johnpeel3904@... [peel] wrote: > >> >> >> Well if there was a 1964 show in existence (Peel was then called John > >> Ravenscroft and living and working as a DJ on an American radio >> station) featuring Peel, I would love to hear that !! >> >> From stuartb@... Wed Jun 12 14:18:54 2019 From: stuartb@... (Stuart Brooks) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:18:54 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: SHOWS MISSING ? CAN I HELP ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The calendar pages (root fandom wiki url then /1967 etc) has a list of available shows under the calendar and the files if still available are on the individual show pages. On each calendar page is a link to List Of Shows which is a spreadsheet listing all dates of Radio 1 shows and whether they have been shared, with lots of stats On 12 June 2019 08:33:00 BST, "simond.phillips@... [peel]" wrote: >Seconded! I'm so grateful to this site for giving me such wonderful >recordings of the great JP in, what are for me, his prime years >1967-1970. But I do find the Wikia a little difficult to navigate so >I'm never quite sure if have everything that circulates from that >period. Does anyone have it as a single list anywhere please? Thanks >for all the great work, guys! From billfromnorthwales@... Wed Jun 12 14:42:07 2019 From: billfromnorthwales@... (billfromnorthwales@...) Date: 12 Jun 2019 05:42:07 -0700 Subject: [peel] Re: SHOWS MISSING ? CAN I HELP ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Probably he sounded more like this http://www.peel.mooo.com/peelgroup/BillfromNorthWales/03%20Misc/Young%20Peel.wav http://www.peel.mooo.com/peelgroup/BillfromNorthWales/03%20Misc/Young%20Peel.wav From simond.phillips@... Wed Jun 12 15:28:57 2019 From: simond.phillips@... (simond.phillips@...) Date: 12 Jun 2019 13:28:57 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: SHOWS MISSING ? CAN I HELP ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks! From johnpeel3904@... Thu Jun 13 10:50:38 2019 From: johnpeel3904@... (johnpeel3904@...) Date: 13 Jun 2019 01:50:38 -0700 Subject: [peel] Perfumed Garden 06 August 1967: new material In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dan, it’s not that difficult to browse on the Peel fandom site and that’s coming from someone who is not even technical or I.T proficient. From silva_uk@... Thu Jun 13 16:14:22 2019 From: silva_uk@... (JoE Silva) Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: SHOWS MISSING ? CAN I HELP ? References: <1273764574.944827.1560435262533.ref@...> Message-ID: <1273764574.944827.1560435262533@...> Just checking out the June 30, 1975 show from the Decktician Reels and was wondering why John's commentary is removed. Are all the shows in this series similar? From johnpeel3904@... Thu Jun 13 17:04:25 2019 From: johnpeel3904@... (johnpeel3904@...) Date: 13 Jun 2019 15:04:25 +0000 Subject: SHOWS MISSING ? CAN I HELP ? In-Reply-To: <1273764574.944827.1560435262533@...> References: <1273764574.944827.1560435262533.ref@...> <1273764574.944827.1560435262533@...> Message-ID: Whoever recorded it, edited the audio like that in 1975. And yes the Decktician Reels are all edited like that. From stuartb@... Sat Jun 15 22:34:55 2019 From: stuartb@... (Stuart Brooks) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 21:34:55 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: Completing BFBS 22/10/93 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <96C28C4F350040539D66A5A85B2D408F@StuartGaming5> Thanks for that, another one completed ! From: iceage01@... [peel] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 11:27 PM To: peel@yahoogroups.com Subject: [peel] Re: Completing BFBS 22/10/93 Oh forgot to put the link: http://mooo.peelwiki.com/dl/max-dat/Updates/Dat_036_JP_BFBS-931022%20(rev).mp3 CK --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From martinwheatley@... Sun Jun 16 21:39:13 2019 From: martinwheatley@... (martinwheatley@...) Date: 16 Jun 2019 19:39:13 +0000 Subject: Access Message-ID: For a long time although I have been able to read this group I haven't to post to it. I've made some changes and I want to see if this gets through From timgiebel@... Sun Jun 16 22:04:55 2019 From: timgiebel@... (Tim Giebel-Inanloo) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 20:04:55 +0000 Subject: [peel] Access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Seems to have come through fine :-) On 16 Jun 2019, at 20:39, martinwheatley@sky.com [peel] > wrote: For a long time although I have been able to read this group I haven't to post to it. I've made some changes and I want to see if this gets through From numbernine@... Mon Jun 17 12:53:57 2019 From: numbernine@... (Patrick Kimura-Macke) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:53:57 +0100 Subject: Lee Tapes 550 and 551 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <953CA7CA-E4C3-4EB3-826F-5F4E9B1E39C3@...> Dear Stuart LE550 and LE551 files seem to be missing from the Mooo Index of /dl/ Stuart/Lee. Patrick LLe. From stuartb@... Mon Jun 17 23:24:48 2019 From: stuartb@... (Stuart Brooks) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 22:24:48 +0100 Subject: [peel] Lee Tapes 550 and 551 In-Reply-To: <953CA7CA-E4C3-4EB3-826F-5F4E9B1E39C3@...> References: <953CA7CA-E4C3-4EB3-826F-5F4E9B1E39C3@...> Message-ID: <7C38D7E3-3675-46C3-80BD-B89CE46F9DCD@...> Hi, should be there now On 17 June 2019 11:53:57 BST, "Patrick Kimura-Macke numbernine@... [peel]" wrote: >Dear Stuart > >LE550 and LE551 files seem to be missing from the Mooo Index of /dl/ >Stuart/Lee. > >Patrick > > LLe. From so_it_goes_2512@... Wed Jun 19 00:09:28 2019 From: so_it_goes_2512@... (so_it_goes_2512@...) Date: 18 Jun 2019 22:09:28 +0000 Subject: Rewriting history Message-ID: To all the hard-working Wikifiers out there: a Fandom admin has decided that the Peel Wiki page on Nigger Kojak should be deleted. I enclose her comments and my reply. I would be interested to know what others think before I give up contributing to this site for good. Hi, I'm sorry, we do not allow that word on Fandom (although there are many existing mentions that need clearing up!) I have had to remove the page, but you are welcome to restore it with the word censored out - n***** is acceptable. I'm sorry for the trouble, Regards, -- Sannse Sannse Cushway Fandom Community Support Your response is totally inappropriate. That page had existed since 2013 (even though I had to get a previous admin to allow it). It is the name of an artist and your revisioinist censorship robs the Wiki of an artist important to Peel's history and you have eradicated many hours of work by dedicated Wiki members. I will be highlighting this to the group and will continue to fight your decision. What if I had not pointed it out? And why is the word allowed on Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger)???? I request that you reverse the decision forthwith. Steve (TK) From johnpeel3904@... Wed Jun 19 00:31:51 2019 From: johnpeel3904@... (johnpeel3904@...) Date: 18 Jun 2019 22:31:51 +0000 Subject: Rewriting history In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I think the Fandom controllers have gone way overboard with this. Nigger Kojak was an artist who decided to call himself that, and he's a black person after all. It wasn't anybody else. Also the name used by the artist on the article did not incite or derogatory anyone who was black. I would have understand if the article was removed, because it incited or derogatorise black people, that would have been a different thing, but if they had bothered to read the article, they would have known the article did not insult anyone of any colour or skin tone !! From chrisjbrady@... Wed Jun 19 00:42:08 2019 From: chrisjbrady@... (Chris J Brady) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 22:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [peel] Rewriting history References: <1624910952.557294.1560897728717.ref@...> Message-ID: <1624910952.557294.1560897728717@...> Shes likely an American female snowflake fresh out of college who thinks she knows everything but actually knows nothing. She now thnks that she's in charge of perceived anti-PC'ness by upholding her narrow-mnded understanding of plubic morals. She uses the erm 'we' - exactly who are this 'we' and where does it state the policy that she's trying to enforce? Year's ago I suffered similar issues when I was trying to set up Wiki pages. Then I kept getting my uploads removed by self-appointed arrogant ar$eholes who knew nothing about my subjects but insisted that I keep rephrasing every thing I had uploaded to suit their narrow mindedness. Eventually I gave up. Life's too short to justify wasting time with these arrogant ar$eholes aka American snowflakes. CJB. -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 18/6/19, so_it_goes_2512@... [peel] wrote: Subject: [peel] Rewriting history To: peel@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, 18 June, 2019, 23:09   To all the hard-working Wikifiers out there: a Fandom admin has decided that the Peel Wiki page on Nigger Kojak should be deleted. I enclose her comments and my reply. I would be interested to know what others think before I give up contributing to this site for good. Hi,I'm sorry, we do not allow that word on Fandom (although there are many existing mentions that need clearing up!)I have had to remove the page, but you are welcome to restore it with the word censored out - n***** is acceptable.I'm sorry for the trouble,Regards,-- SannseSannse CushwayFandom Community Support Your response is totally inappropriate. That page had existed since 2013 (even though I had to get a previous admin to allow it). It is the name of an artist and your revisioinist censorship robs the Wiki of an artist important to Peel's history and you have eradicated many hours of work by dedicated Wiki members. I will be highlighting this to the group and will continue to fight your decision. What if I had not pointed it out? And why is the word allowed on Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger)???? I request that you reverse the decision forthwith. Steve (TK) mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #y margin-bottom:10px;} padding:0 0;} margin:0;} color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #yiv font-family:Arial;} rp-sponsor margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} y { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} font-weight:700;} text-transform:uppercase;} color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} span span { color:#ff7900;} text-decoration:underline;} yiv1002105376attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} div a { text-decoration:none;} { border:none;padding-right:5px;} abel { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} ttach label a { text-decoration:none;} margin:0 0 0 4px;} font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} text-decoration:none;} font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} n { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} margin-right:0;} text-decoration:none;} width:400px;} text-decoration:none;} photo-title a:hover, { text-decoration:none;} # font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} n { color:#628c2a;} margin:0 0 0 0;} font-size:0;} 76photos div { float:left;width:72px;} tos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} font-size:77%;} font-size:77%;} margin:4px;} -actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} e { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} sg select, font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} code { font:115% monospace;} line-height:1.22em;} padding-bottom:10px;} font-family:Verdana;} color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} o-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} grp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} font-family:Georgia;} margin:0 0 1em 0;} font-size:120%;} border-right:none !important; } 02105376 From chrisjbrady@... Wed Jun 19 00:45:09 2019 From: chrisjbrady@... (Chris J Brady) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 22:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [peel] Re: Rewriting history References: <1935347922.2594976.1560897909692.ref@...> Message-ID: <1935347922.2594976.1560897909692@...> You are assuming that these moderators can actually read. CJB -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 18/6/19, johnpeel3904@... [peel] wrote: Subject: [peel] Re: Rewriting history To: peel@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, 18 June, 2019, 23:31 I think the Fandom controllers have gone way overboard with this. Nigger Kojak was an artist who decided to call himself that, and he's a black person after all. It wasn't anybody else. Also the name used by the artist on the article did not incite or derogatory anyone who was black. I would have understand if the article was removed, because it incited or derogatorise black people, that would have been a different thing, but if they had bothered to read the article, they would have known the article did not insult anyone of any colour or skin tone !! Posted by: johnpeel3904@... From M.Luetchford@... Wed Jun 19 00:47:02 2019 From: M.Luetchford@... (MARK LUETCHFORD) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 22:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [peel] Rewriting history In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <979528485.5336103.1560898022472@...> https://aaregistry.org/story/nigger-the-word-a-brief-history/  - a good in depth analysis of the word and its uses on a site called African American Registry - dedicated to enhancing the US school curiculum and education of teachers on African American culture and history and  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papa_Kojak proves he exists! He is also probably on spotify (other music sharing sites are available!) using that name - are they censoring all songs that use the word on there? Anyway - Steve if you feel that you have to go over this that would be a massive problem for this community. Is it time to look at moving the site? But that might be problematic - I've no idea how that could be done. I presume everyone would balk at using self-censorship or using Papa Kojak because that would be unprincipled. Does any audio exist with what John Peel thought. I can't imagine he didn't make a comment on it. A conundrum. I would favour trying to provide them with a compromise by including a link to a site that explains how the word has been used in history (eg the one above). In that way we would be probably fulfilling the reason why he chose the name in the first place. maybe they should contact him and ask his opinion? I presume he knew exactly what he was doing when he chose the name. I'm guessing but I suspect he wanted to draw attention to the way his race was and is perceived?  Personally it is a word I would not use but living in a country that was made wealthy by the exploitation of people exported from Africa - who died in their millions so that we could have sugar/cotton/tobacco grown without sharing any of the profits with those who produced it which could then be processed and sold for massive profits which created the society we live in - I should not be allowed to tell their descendants what they can and can't call themselves.  Mark On Tuesday, 18 June 2019, 23:09:41 BST, so_it_goes_2512@... [peel] wrote:   To all the hard-working Wikifiers out there: a Fandom admin has decided that the Peel Wiki page on Nigger Kojak should be deleted. I enclose her comments and my reply. I would be interested to know what others think before I give up contributing to this site for good. Hi, I'm sorry, we do not allow that word on Fandom (although there are many existing mentions that need clearing up!) I have had to remove the page, but you are welcome to restore it with the word censored out - n***** is acceptable. I'm sorry for the trouble, Regards, -- Sannse Sannse Cushway Fandom Community Support Your response is totally inappropriate. That page had existed since 2013 (even though I had to get a previous admin to allow it). It is the name of an artist and your revisioinist censorship robs the Wiki of an artist important to Peel's history and you have eradicated many hours of work by dedicated Wiki members. I will be highlighting this to the group and will continue to fight your decision. What if I had not pointed it out? And why is the word allowed on Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger)???? I request that you reverse the decision forthwith. Steve (TK) From dr_mango2004@... Wed Jun 19 01:20:43 2019 From: dr_mango2004@... (dr_mango2004@...) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [peel] Rewriting history In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <550130900.5328962.1560900043957@...> I noticed about a week ago that the entry for Birdland's "Rock N Roll Nigger" had been excised from the covers page, but censoring Nigger Kojak takes the biscuit! So much irony. DM On Tuesday, 18 June 2019, 23:09:40 BST, so_it_goes_2512@... [peel] wrote:   To all the hard-working Wikifiers out there: a Fandom admin has decided that the Peel Wiki page on Nigger Kojak should be deleted. I enclose her comments and my reply. I would be interested to know what others think before I give up contributing to this site for good. Hi, I'm sorry, we do not allow that word on Fandom (although there are many existing mentions that need clearing up!) I have had to remove the page, but you are welcome to restore it with the word censored out - n***** is acceptable. I'm sorry for the trouble, Regards, -- Sannse Sannse Cushway Fandom Community Support Your response is totally inappropriate. That page had existed since 2013 (even though I had to get a previous admin to allow it). It is the name of an artist and your revisioinist censorship robs the Wiki of an artist important to Peel's history and you have eradicated many hours of work by dedicated Wiki members. I will be highlighting this to the group and will continue to fight your decision. What if I had not pointed it out? And why is the word allowed on Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger)???? I request that you reverse the decision forthwith. Steve (TK) #9photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align: From stuartb@... Wed Jun 19 01:36:17 2019 From: stuartb@... (Stuart Brooks) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:36:17 +0100 Subject: [peel] Rewriting history In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <113C11EDB8A041CF9602DC907564685E@StuartAberdeen> It’s totally silly as others have said – though the other 29 occurrences of the term still exist (for now). Perhaps it drew particular attention as it was an article/named page? And there are plenty of Youtube hits for him. Though to me the bigger loss would be if you gave up. From: so_it_goes_2512@... [peel] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 11:09 PM To: peel@yahoogroups.com Subject: [peel] Rewriting history To all the hard-working Wikifiers out there: a Fandom admin has decided that the Peel Wiki page on Nigger Kojak should be deleted. I enclose her comments and my reply. I would be interested to know what others think before I give up contributing to this site for good. Hi, I'm sorry, we do not allow that word on Fandom (although there are many existing mentions that need clearing up!) I have had to remove the page, but you are welcome to restore it with the word censored out - n***** is acceptable. I'm sorry for the trouble, Regards, -- Sannse Sannse Cushway Fandom Community Support Your response is totally inappropriate. That page had existed since 2013 (even though I had to get a previous admin to allow it). It is the name of an artist and your revisioinist censorship robs the Wiki of an artist important to Peel's history and you have eradicated many hours of work by dedicated Wiki members. I will be highlighting this to the group and will continue to fight your decision. What if I had not pointed it out? And why is the word allowed on Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger)???? I request that you reverse the decision forthwith. Steve (TK) From robfleay@... Wed Jun 19 10:27:25 2019 From: robfleay@... (RobF) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:27:25 +0100 Subject: [peel] Rewriting history In-Reply-To: <113C11EDB8A041CF9602DC907564685E@StuartAberdeen> References: <113C11EDB8A041CF9602DC907564685E@StuartAberdeen> Message-ID: Steve (TK) - I assume that you are oir admin on Fandom? Have you ever thought about migrating to a self-hosted wiki? It's probably a big undertaking and would require some hosting costs but at least we'd have full control (and no adverts!) On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 00:36, 'Stuart Brooks' stuartb@brooks22.plus.com [peel] wrote: > > > It’s totally silly as others have said – though the other 29 occurrences > of the term still exist (for now). Perhaps it drew particular attention as > it was an article/named page? And there are plenty of Youtube hits for him. > Though to me the bigger loss would be if you gave up. > *From:* so_it_goes_2512@... [peel] > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 18, 2019 11:09 PM > *To:* peel@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* [peel] Rewriting history > > > > To all the hard-working Wikifiers out there: a Fandom admin has decided > that the Peel Wiki page on Nigger Kojak should be deleted. I enclose her > comments and my reply. I would be interested to know what others think > before I give up contributing to this site for good. > > > Hi, > > I'm sorry, we do not allow that word on Fandom (although there are many > existing mentions that need clearing up!) > > I have had to remove the page, but you are welcome to restore it with the > word censored out - n***** is acceptable. > > I'm sorry for the trouble, > > Regards, > > -- Sannse > > Sannse Cushway > > Fandom Community Support > > > > Your response is totally inappropriate. That page had existed since 2013 > (even though I had to get a previous admin to allow it). It is the name of > an artist and your revisioinist censorship robs the Wiki of an artist > important to Peel's history and you have eradicated many hours of work by > dedicated Wiki members. I will be highlighting this to the group and will > continue to fight your decision. What if I had not pointed it out? And why > is the word allowed on Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger)???? I > request that you reverse the decision forthwith. > > > > Steve (TK) > > > > From numbernine@... Wed Jun 19 15:15:39 2019 From: numbernine@... (Patrick Kimura-Macke) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:15:39 +0100 Subject: [peel] Lee Tapes 550 and 551 In-Reply-To: <7C38D7E3-3675-46C3-80BD-B89CE46F9DCD@...> References: <953CA7CA-E4C3-4EB3-826F-5F4E9B1E39C3@...> <7C38D7E3-3675-46C3-80BD-B89CE46F9DCD@...> Message-ID: <83EF528F-C1A7-4105-9F5F-AA8D072DBCBC@...> Dear Stuart Yes. Thank you. Patrick From timgiebel@... Thu Jun 20 09:58:12 2019 From: timgiebel@... (Tim Giebel-Inanloo) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:58:12 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, , Message-ID: Hi, Kev found a few more cassettes of Peel stuf. Most were sessions such as Jesus and Mary chain, Bikini Kill, hole etc with John’s intros and outros. I uploaded those, and there was also a cassette of the first 90 minutes from the 12th of April 1973 which I also uploaded a couple of days ago. I noticed that it hasn’t been added to the page yet, and I was just checking that it has uploaded alright? Let me know if it’s not showing up on the mooo and I will upload again :-) On 2 Jun 2019, at 21:37, thebarguest@yahoo.co.uk [peel] > wrote: Many thanks, Tim ! I'm listening to the 1972 show now, and it's really good quality, amazing to think it's nearly 47 years old ! Nice music as well... From stuartb@... Thu Jun 20 10:49:50 2019 From: stuartb@... (Stuart Brooks) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:49:50 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, , Message-ID: <36547624-C5C2-4A54-89C0-E347BAA81547@...> seems to be there fine, I did add a few to the wiki recently but it's probably just that JP3904 and myself haven't been checking the Mooo on a daily basis! On 20 June 2019 08:58:12 BST, "Tim Giebel-Inanloo timgiebel@hotmail.co.uk [peel]" wrote: >Hi, >Kev found a few more cassettes of Peel stuf. Most were sessions such as >Jesus and Mary chain, Bikini Kill, hole etc with John’s intros and >outros. I uploaded those, and there was also a cassette of the first 90 >minutes from the 12th of April 1973 which I also uploaded a couple of >days ago. I noticed that it hasn’t been added to the page yet, and I >was just checking that it has uploaded alright? Let me know if it’s not >showing up on the mooo and I will upload again :-) > >On 2 Jun 2019, at 21:37, >thebarguest@yahoo.co.uk [peel] >> wrote: > > > >Many thanks, Tim ! I'm listening to the 1972 show now, and it's really >good quality, amazing to think it's nearly 47 years old ! Nice music as >well... From timgiebel@... Thu Jun 20 10:52:41 2019 From: timgiebel@... (Tim Giebel-Inanloo) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 08:52:41 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: <36547624-C5C2-4A54-89C0-E347BAA81547@...> References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, , ,<36547624-C5C2-4A54-89C0-E347BAA81547@...> Message-ID: No problem, great, thanks On 20 Jun 2019, at 09:50, Stuart Brooks stuartb@brooks22.plus.com [peel] > wrote: seems to be there fine, I did add a few to the wiki recently but it's probably just that JP3904 and myself haven't been checking the Mooo on a daily basis! On 20 June 2019 08:58:12 BST, "Tim Giebel-Inanloo timgiebel@hotmail.co.uk [peel]" > wrote: Hi, Kev found a few more cassettes of Peel stuf. Most were sessions such as Jesus and Mary chain, Bikini Kill, hole etc with John’s intros and outros. I uploaded those, and there was also a cassette of the first 90 minutes from the 12th of April 1973 which I also uploaded a couple of days ago. I noticed that it hasn’t been added to the page yet, and I was just checking that it has uploaded alright? Let me know if it’s not showing up on the mooo and I will upload again :-) On 2 Jun 2019, at 21:37, thebarguest@yahoo.co.uk [peel] > wrote: Many thanks, Tim ! I'm listening to the 1972 show now, and it's really good quality, amazing to think it's nearly 47 years old ! Nice music as well.... From chrisjbrady@... Thu Jun 20 10:54:19 2019 From: chrisjbrady@... (Chris J Brady) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 08:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [peel] Peel and Ships References: <2059725546.3160274.1561020859662.ref@...> Message-ID: <2059725546.3160274.1561020859662@...> I recall some years ago that Peel did the presentation for a tv series on sailing and ships. Does anyone know anything about this. I thnk I might have the tapes. CJB From robfleay@... Thu Jun 20 11:19:43 2019 From: robfleay@... (RobF) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:19:43 +0100 Subject: [peel] Peel and Ships In-Reply-To: <2059725546.3160274.1561020859662@...> References: <2059725546.3160274.1561020859662.ref@...> <2059725546.3160274.1561020859662@...> Message-ID: That'd be Classic Ships https://peel.fandom.com/wiki/Classic_Ships The weupload link is no longer valid, and I remember downloading them at the time. Not sure if I still have them but digital copies are out there already On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 09:54, Chris J Brady chrisjbrady@... [peel] < peel@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > I recall some years ago that Peel did the presentation for a tv series on > sailing and ships. Does anyone know anything about this. I thnk I might > have the tapes. CJB > > > ------------------------------------ > Posted by: Chris J Brady > ------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo Groups Links > > > > From johnpeel3904@... Thu Jun 20 13:53:51 2019 From: johnpeel3904@... (johnpeel3904@...) Date: 20 Jun 2019 11:53:51 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, , ,<36547624-C5C2-4A54-89C0-E347BAA81547@...> Message-ID: Thanks Tim, your file is available to download via the wiki page of 12 April 1973 https://peel.fandom.com/wiki/12_April_1973 From timgiebel@... Thu Jun 20 14:19:20 2019 From: timgiebel@... (Tim Giebel-Inanloo) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:19:20 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Show updates In-Reply-To: References: <5CEC83C6.4020502@...> <0C446C7BAA344E509A681F5AA399AE21@StuartGaming5>, , ,<36547624-C5C2-4A54-89C0-E347BAA81547@...> , Message-ID: Thanks :) On 20 Jun 2019, at 12:54, johnpeel3904@yahoo.co.uk [peel] > wrote: Thanks Tim, your file is available to download via the wiki page of 12 April 1973 From so_it_goes_2512@... Thu Jun 20 18:34:55 2019 From: so_it_goes_2512@... (so_it_goes_2512@...) Date: 20 Jun 2019 16:34:55 +0000 Subject: Rewriting history In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi gang Many thanks for all your support. This woman has taken it upon herself to reinstate the page as N***** Kojak (but hasn't changed all the linked pages). If you are interested, the conversation is here https://peel.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Sannse. If any of you have similar problems Tiny URL can allow you to link to pages with the "offending" words in them. Now I remember it, at one time we couldn't even have a page on the Sex Pistols for this reason. Now let's all sit back and wait for Anal Cunt, Prosthetic Cunt, A Black Man A Black Man And Another Black Man, Harry Pussy and other venerable artists to suffer the same fate. Steve (TK) From klacktoveedesteen@... Thu Jun 20 18:56:53 2019 From: klacktoveedesteen@... (Pete Conkerton) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [peel] Re: Rewriting history In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <13900917.6903878.1561049813409@...> ...not to mention Arab Strap, The Silver Jews - once you start down that path it's difficult to know where to stop... Meant to dehibernate to send a supportive email earlier - thanks for everything you do Steve, and all other toilers on the mighty edifice that is the Peel wiki. It'd be a poorer world without it. Cheers aye, Pete On ‎Thursday‎, ‎20‎ ‎June‎ ‎2019‎ ‎17‎:‎35‎:‎14‎ ‎BST, so_it_goes_2512@... [peel] wrote:   Hi gang Many thanks for all your support. This woman has taken it upon herself to reinstate the page as N***** Kojak (but hasn't changed all the linked pages). If you are interested, the conversation is here. If any of you have similar problems Tiny URL can allow you to link to pages with the "offending" words in them. Now I remember it, at one time we couldn't even have a page on the Sex Pistols for this reason.Now let's all sit back and wait for Anal Cunt, Prosthetic Cunt, A Black Man A Black Man And Another Black Man, Harry Pussy and other venerable artists to suffer the same fate.Steve (TK) lor:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yi0439photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-ali From stuartb@... Thu Jun 20 23:12:50 2019 From: stuartb@... (stuartb@...) Date: 20 Jun 2019 21:12:50 +0000 Subject: Unbroken run Sep 1990 to March 1995 Message-ID: Going over the old OT Mixtapes managed to date a few more of these, which ended up adding a few tracks to the last missing show of 1994. This means that from 27th September 1990 to 5th March 1995 every Peel show has at least some content available, the longest run that there is. Stuart From johnpeel3904@... Fri Jun 21 00:11:40 2019 From: johnpeel3904@... (johnpeel3904@...) Date: 20 Jun 2019 15:11:40 -0700 Subject: Unbroken run Sep 1990 to March 1995 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Peel is probably the only Radio 1 DJ that has more audio contents of his shows on the internet than any other DJ, who has worked on the station Of course it helps that he worked there between 1967 and 2004. From johnpeel3904@... Fri Jun 21 00:14:24 2019 From: johnpeel3904@... (johnpeel3904@...) Date: 20 Jun 2019 22:14:24 +0000 Subject: Rewriting history In-Reply-To: <13900917.6903878.1561049813409@...> References: <13900917.6903878.1561049813409@...> Message-ID: Also don't forget the word 'Honky', according to dictionary.com, it is a derogatory term used by black people for a white person or for white people collectively. A very American word, that is also commonly found on the Peel wiki site by white musicians, who call their tracks or albums that !! See the connection with Nigger Kojak, a black musician, who called himself that !!