[peel] Peter Hammill question

[Pete Conkerton]

Thanks chaps, much obliged
Pete 

    On Thursday, 21 January 2016, 17:44, "Martin Wheatley martinwheatley@... [peel]" <peel@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

     Not a KG omission    According to my info it was done for Richard Skinner

On 21 January 2016 at 15:47, Pete Conkerton klacktoveedesteen@... [peel] <peel@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

      Dunno why it's taken me so long to notice, but the Peter Hammill Peel Sessions cd includes 4 tracks dated 04-12-88. Ken's bible only lists sessions up to 1979. So, is it (perish the thought) a KG omission, or were they recorded for someone else?
I'd check with In Session Tonight but I can't find my copy and, worryingly, I haven't seen it since I moved house. Oo-er...
Cheers aye,
Pete   

kp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10pxivity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10isplay:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#