Hmmm....

[egdirdle2001]

--- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "so_it_goes_2512" <so_it_goes_2512@...> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations on finding the right form of words to get a response.
> 
> Absolutely. Mind you, our Nick is pretty adept at wordsmithery himself. Without wishing to prolong this thread beyond its natural life, I thought others might be interested in his reply:
> 
> "Hi mark , i appreciate the tone of your comment,unlike the previous condescending wrist slapping events from your colleagues at Peel Wiki. I thought the object was to share some John Peel shows? I could have typed it all out again myself I suppose, but what idiot would do that just to avoid netiquette faux pas's? To avoid further snottiness i will get round to crediting the peel wiki on all my peel posts where appropriate.
> Any other shit will be deleted if no polite!
> Have a good one,
> Nick (former member of the peel wiki,and typer of at least ten of the peel show running orders thank you very much)."
> 
> As I said before, nice....
> 
> Steve (tK and 'typer' of a few more than ten running orders)

Its a shame things get like this. People on here had a good case to raise issues. Words often look sterner when written. But people at the other end can disarm everyone so much easier with replies that are a bit more mature than that one.
>