[peel] Re: 400 Box (1 more)

[MARK LUETCHFORD]

Ken
 
Agree.
 
If your SL tapes are like mine they will be very random - with long gaps in the middle of the tapes - kershaw on one side and peel on the other and sometimes other stuff. It appears that at one time all the tapes were copied on to other tapes in no particular order. I don't have any complete shows - when they are all up some kind soul (who perhaps doesn't volunteer for ripping or uploading duties but gets to listen to all our painfully extracted material) could perhaps stitch them together - I think we will then get lots of complete shows. ;-).
 
Mark

--- On Sun, 17/7/11, ken <ken_garner@...> wrote:


From: ken <ken_garner@yahoo.com>
Subject: [peel] Re: 400 Box (1 more)
To: peel@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, 17 July, 2011, 18:52


  



well, sorry, I kinda disagree. The really time consuming hard work is ripping and dating etc. Then if someone else wants to pull them together later, including with other sections someone else has ripped sometimes, that's a great help. And some of us (me!) use software that seems to merely produce 3 or 4 whatever linked files in a folder, rather than a single file, when you follow instructions to merge files. And I am not going to learn yet another package just for this. This one did not come from me!

ken

ps. by the way, later this summer I have to get going on my batch from Rocker of the SL tapes from early 90s, and I plan simply to rip and post as 45 min-long (or 30 mins), cassette-side sections. So there!

--- In peel@yahoogroups.com, Dr Mango <dr_mango2004@...> wrote:
>
> Without wanting to sound too p*ssy, this is the kind of thing I'd normally expect the ripper to do, especially since these files all seem to have come from the same source. 
> 
> DM
> 
> --- On Sun, 17/7/11, Stuart <stuartb@...> wrote:
> 
> From: Stuart <stuartb@...>
> Subject: RE: [peel] 400 Box (1 more)
> To: peel@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, 17 July, 2011, 14:37
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Â 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> What’s the best way to knit together? Best
> of all is probably to use the original Audacity (or whatever) files to join
> them, then encode as flac and mp3. It can be done after the fact, by
> reimporting the individual mp3s and re-encoding a composite, but does this
> process perhaps lose some quality in the process? 
> 
> Â  
> 
> Stuart 
> 
> Â  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> peel@yahoogroups.com [mailto: peel@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Dr Mango
> 
> Sent: 17 July 2011 14:25
> 
> To: peel@yahoogroups.com
> 
> Subject: Re: [peel] 400 Box (1
> more) 
> 
> 
> 
> Â  
> 
> Â  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Woah, six files! Does anyone plan to knit these
> together into a single entity? Seems to be about 9 mins short of a full show
> there.
> 
> 
> 
> DM
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Sun, 17/7/11, steve <saipanda@...>
> wrote: 
> 
> 
> From: steve <saipanda@...>
> 
> Subject: [peel] 400 Box (1 more)
> 
> To: peel@yahoogroups.com
> 
> Date: Sunday, 17 July, 2011, 9:50 
> 
> Â  
> 
> Back to 1979 again, and a nearly complete show from
> 32 years ago next week:
> 
> 
> 
> 23 July 1979 ( UK 
> Subs, Tubeway Army)
> 
> http://peel.wikia.com/wiki/23_July_1979
> 
> 
> 
> Of interest to some no doubt - Peel tells us a bit about his first-ever Fall
> gig, which took place the previous weekend (on a double bill at the Factory
> in Manchester 
> with Echo & The Bunnymen, in case you were wondering).
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> SW
>