new peel shows tapes in groovy personal "compilation-tape" streaming site
ken
ken_garner@...
Sat Feb 5 12:10:45 CET 2011
re "resumably the streaming license applies to
> content originally acquired legally? "
frankly in the USA I don't think the copyright agencies give a stuff as long as they get paid. Who is going to notice that some of these mixes include off air clips?
Answer: only nerds like us!
k
--- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "Stuart" <stuartb@...> wrote:
>
> A premium lead! Wikifying the Nov 1982 show as I'm listening to it, will put
> a link on the page to the streaming site.
>
>
>
> The legalities are interesting - presumably the streaming license applies to
> content originally acquired legally? Which an off air recording would not
> be.
>
>
>
> Stuart
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: peel@yahoogroups.com [mailto:peel@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ken
> Sent: 03 February 2011 23:56
> To: peel@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [peel] Re: new peel shows tapes in groovy personal
> "compilation-tape" streaming site
>
>
>
>
>
>
> well, if you read his FAQs on his facebook page, it's clear he does not
> allow downloading saying "we are not legally allowed to do so" which perhaps
> implies to me he is paying to run a basic legal modest streaming licence -
> cf dandelion radio, but with a far more liberal copyright / payment regime
> in the USA, of course. Given his job and past career, he can probably afford
> to!
>
> k
>
> --- In peel@yahoogroups.com <mailto:peel%40yahoogroups.com> , Martin
> Wheatley <martinw@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I suppose assuming it's legal it does cost money to do properly...
> > >
> > >cheers
> > >
> > >ken
> > >
> > ><http://www.patestapes.com/>http://www.patestapes.com/
> >
> >
> > And of course it isn't legal. It's very unlikely he owns the
> > copyright to all (or any) of the music
> >
> >
> > martinw
> >
>
More information about the Peel
mailing list