New Mooo page/Peel at Sonar

[steve]

Hi Roger,

No problem as long as we know there might be a reversal in the order but the cards are in the right ballpark. We can listen to the files and check what's on them and then use that to guide us on the card front.

Some confusion on tape 4 (the second side of the tape actually follows the first from the same show), but we can make a note on the wiki about that to indicate what's going on with the file.

Is a big help to have the inset cards, though, even if the order is initially confusing. Many thanks for both them and the files in the first place.

Cheers,

Steve

--- In peel@yahoogroups.com, Roger Carruthers <unity.gain@...> wrote:
>
> I tried to be as methodical as I could, pencilling  number on the backs of
> the card before I put them in the scanner, but you¹re right ­ I still f**ed
> up!
>  Probably something to do with them being upside down and rotated 90; they
> actually are, as you say
> L002 L001
> L004 L003
>  There¹s a good chance I¹ve done the same thing with the others then...
> Cheers
> Roger
> 
> PS. I wouldn¹t hold out for the a and b files beings as marked on the tapes;
> about that part, I¹m afraid I was unmethodical.
> 
> 
> On 24/10/2010 19:33, "steve" <saipanda@...> wrote:
> 
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >    
> > 
> > Ah, but I'm a bit confused now, as you're numbering system seems different on
> > the cards and the names on the files that are up. Maybe we need to sort these
> > out somehow.
> > 
> > On the 1-4 file cards (left to right, first row then second row, which you say
> > would make them L001, L002, L003, L004)
> > 
> > 1 card. Not sure about (maybe file L002)
> > 2 card. Seems to be file L001
> > 3 card. Seems to be L004 file, with side a and b reversed according to the
> > files.
> > 4 card. Seems to be L003.
> > 
> > Can we just go with the names of the files and I'll switch the card
> > tracklistings on the tape pages to suit the names of the files that are up?
> > 
> > Maybe you got the file card shuffle mixed up or something. Or maybe it's just
> > me confused.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > PS Only checked the first batch of four file cards so far.
> > 
> > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com <mailto:peel%40yahoogroups.com> , "steve"
> > <saipanda@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Many thanks, Roger! This will be a really big help on the wiki front. Will
> >> post the relevant bits on the tape pages and then we take it from there for
> >> working out what the shows might be.
> >> > 
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > 
> >> > Steve
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com <mailto:peel%40yahoogroups.com> , "bty997881"
> >> <unity.gain@> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > Inlay cards 1-16 are now scanned and uploaded to the same folder as the
> >>> tapes.
> >>> > >  I've scanned them 4-up, arranged L-R, top- bottom, if that makes
> >>> sense,eg.
> >>> > > L001 L002
> >>> > > L003 L004
> >>> > > cheers
> >>> > > Roger
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com <mailto:peel%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> >>> "bty997881" <unity.gain@> wrote:
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Almost finished uploading my first batch of L tapes, that's L001 to
> >>>> L020; hopefully will have done so by close of business today.
> >>>> > > >  A couple of corrections for anyone who has downloaded any of these
> >>>> already:
> >>>> > > > L004a & b turned out to actually be L008a & b (mea culpa), and by a
> >>>> process of elimination, the un-named tape, which I was calling L00x, must
> >>>> be L014. I've amended the file names online.
> >>>> > > >  I'll start scanning the inlay cards over the weekend,
> >>>> > > > cheers
> >>>> > > > Roger
> >>>> > > > 
> >>>> > > > -
> >>>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >> >
> > 
> >  
> >    
> > 
> >
>