Something new for the weekend

[alanforduk]

> I did it that way because JP notes the recording dates himself on the broadcast 

That's precendent enough for me. I have changed all the other dates accordingly.
Thanks again.

Alan




--- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "Steve" <so_it_goes_2512@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Alan
> 
> Without wishing to get drawn into a discussion about the relative importance of 'first tx vs recording date', I did it that way because JP notes the recording dates himself on the broadcast for the Stupids and the Associates, for example, as opposed to transmission. If you'd like me to change it, no problem. As you say, it doesn't really matter: I was just trying to help out.
> 
> Best wishes
> Steve [TK]
> 
> 
> --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "alanforduk" <ford.alan@> wrote:
> >
> > > with recording dates courtesy of the maestro
> > 
> > Thanks for the thanks Steve, and thanks for updating the wiki page. However, the dates I put in were first transmission dates rather than recording dates. It doesn't really matter - I just put them in for interest - but I think they should all be the same. 
> > Is there any preference/precedent?
> > 
> > Alan
> > 
> > PS And I doubt if I've got any more.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "Steve" <so_it_goes_2512@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alan
> > > 
> > > Thanks a load for this splendid programme: never having heard it first time around, it is a nugget. I have risked my hearing and my sanity by identifying the three tracks for you and inputting them straight to the Wiki, with recording dates courtesy of the maestro Mr. Garner, to whom many thanks for his earlier tape. Are there any more of these? Please???
> > > 
> > > Best wishes
> > > Steve [TK]
> > > 
> > > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "alanforduk" <ford.alan@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As a matter of fact ...
> > > > 
> > > > Last weekend I dug out a small box of tapes from under the stairs. Most are non-peel but, by pure coincidence, two were labelled "JP Classic Sessions".
> > > > One is the same as your show below (only shorter), but the other is from a different show, although unfortunately only 28 mins long.
> > > > Another coincidence is that both shows were followed by Stuart Maconie standing in for Mark Radcliffe. On the second tape SM mentions the fact that it's Epiphany, which dates it to 6/1/97; ie the 4th show of the second series.
> > > > It features mainly cover versions, except for tracks by The Stupids, Extreme Noise Terror and Unseen Terror. John doesn't give names for any of these tracks, so if anyone can identift them please let me know.
> > > > Details here
> > > > http://peel.wikia.com/wiki/06_January_1997
> > > > or download directly from here
> > > > http://www.megaupload.com/?d=9JPH77NR
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers
> > > > 
> > > > Alan
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "ken garner" <ken_garner@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > Here's the first show in the pre-recorded series from the late nineties, John Peel's Classic Sessions, which you can read about on p162 and pp 235-236 of my book. I may have one more of these somewhere, but I know I have none from th second season at Christmas 97. Anyone?
> > > > > 
> > > > > enjoy
> > > > > 
> > > > > k
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://www.megaupload.com/?d=EVQO5189
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>