[peel] Digest Number 760
Wayne Ellis
we1@...
Mon May 24 16:16:20 CEST 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: peel@yahoogroups.com [mailto:peel@yahoogroups.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 7:09 PM
> To: peel@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [peel] Digest Number 760
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-->
> Music that listens to you.
> LAUNCHcast. What's in your mix?
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/akrq7C/FARHAA/n1hLAA/JPJolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
>
> There are 9 messages in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. moz
> From: Michael Gilham <parkrow1@...>
> 2. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
> From: "Jan Buxton" <janb@...>
> 3. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
> From: "garry_latham" <garry_latham@...>
> 4. Re: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
> From: simon smith <moomin@...>
> 5. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
> From: "garry_latham" <garry_latham@...>
> 6. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
> From: "John Bravin" <john.bravin@pandora.be>
> 7. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
> From: "garry_latham" <garry_latham@...>
> 8. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
> From: "John Bravin" <john.bravin@...>
> 9. Morrizzzzzey
> From: <christone@...>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Michael Gilham <parkrow1@...>
> Subject: moz
>
> Mozza's a conundrum isn't he?
>
> Whilst one could certainly describe him as poncey, at the
> same time he's unfailingly self-deprecating. Frankly, I
> think Britain should coax him back to his native land. He's
> languished in Los Angeles for long enough.
>
> peel@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> He is, however, a big self-important ponce. And nobody likes a ponce,
> now do they?
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70/year
>
> [This message contained attachments]
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 20:05:12 +0100
> From: "Jan Buxton" <janb@...>
> Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
>
> On Thursday, May 20, 2004 4:36 PM [GMT+1=CET],
> Rob Strong <robstrong@...> wrote:
>
> > From: "Martin Wheatley" <martinw@...>
> >
> >> >At least three of the station's night time presenters
> are expected
> >> to be >'affected' - whether that means the axe is unclear. In fact
> >> the only clear >thing about the revamp at the moment is that Zane
> >> Lowe is safe - word is his >time slot is about to he doubled.
> >
> > what have we done to deserve that honour?
>
> The new Radio 1 Schedule can be seen here,
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/schedule/july04.shtml
>
> Peel on 23.00-01.00 Tue to Thu.
>
> Zane goes 19.00-21.00 Mon to Thu. Peel preceded by Mike Davies (skate
> punk etc) on Tue, Bobby Friction and Nihal on Wed (asian/urban), and
> Annie Mac on Thu (dance).
>
> --
> Jan
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 22:54:13 -0000
> From: "garry_latham" <garry_latham@yahoo.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
>
> I can't believe they're pushing him back an hour, again. It's just
> too late. My only option would be to stream the shows off the BBC
> site at a later date, but the quality is just not as good.
>
> I say lets complain. Start a campaign.
>
>
> > The new Radio 1 Schedule can be seen here,
> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/schedule/july04.shtml
> >
> > Peel on 23.00-01.00 Tue to Thu.
> >
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 00:04:39 +0100
> From: simon smith <moomin@...>
> Subject: Re: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
>
> In message <c8m1al+3okg@...>, garry_latham
> <garry_latham@...> writes
> >I can't believe they're pushing him back an hour, again.
> It's just too
> >late. My only option would be to stream the shows off the
> BBC site at a
> >later date, but the quality is just not as good.
>
> You could set up your computer to record it using a program like
> audiograbber.
> I remember when he was on from 12 'til 2am. Or at least I think I do.
> Also when they were just on MW. And only an hour long.
>
> --
> simon
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 23:27:58 -0000
> From: "garry_latham" <garry_latham@yahoo.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
>
> I could do that, only I need I new soundcard, as the present one has
> been causing anything I record through it to clip.
>
> Yeah, I can also remember when he was on til 2am, but I was a lot
> younger then, and I didn't have a job to get up for (nor a
> girlfriend who camplains when I stay up til 12, as it is).
>
> Garry
>
> >
> > You could set up your computer to record it using a program like
> > audiograbber.
> > I remember when he was on from 12 'til 2am. Or at least I think I
> do.
> > Also when they were just on MW. And only an hour long.
> >
> > --
> > simon
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:05:27 +0200
> From: "John Bravin" <john.bravin@...>
> Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
>
> John Peel or your girlfriend? Time to step up and show where
> your real loyalties lie.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: garry_latham
> Subject: [peel] Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
>
>
> Yeah, I can also remember when he was on til 2am, but I was a lot
> younger then, and I didn't have a job to get up for (nor a
> girlfriend who camplains when I stay up til 12, as it is).
>
> Garry
>
> [This message contained attachments]
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:13:24 -0000
> From: "garry_latham" <garry_latham@...>
> Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
>
> Oh boy, that's a decision I hope to never have to make. She hasn't
> got a chance ;)
>
> --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "John Bravin" <john.bravin@p...> wrote:
> > John Peel or your girlfriend? Time to step up and show where your
> real loyalties lie.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: garry_latham
> > Subject: [peel] Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
> >
> >
> > Yeah, I can also remember when he was on til 2am, but I was a
> lot
> > younger then, and I didn't have a job to get up for (nor a
> > girlfriend who camplains when I stay up til 12, as it is).
> >
> > Garry
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 12:36:53 +0200
> From: "John Bravin" <john.bravin@pandora.be>
> Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
>
> I see what you mean about a tough decision. Do you display a
> ruthless single-mindedness and stay loyal to the music, or do
> you go all soft, stay with the girlfriend, and hope to be
> interviewed by Peel in a typically sentimental feature on
> Tough Choices on Radio 4's Home Truths.
>
> There is a third way... Keep the girlfriend and listen to
> John Peel at 7:30 every Friday night on BBC World Service
> (648 MW or Digital Radio). If she vetoes that, time to be
> making the "it's me, not you" speech.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: garry_latham
> Subject: [peel] Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter
>
>
> Oh boy, that's a decision I hope to never have to make. She hasn't
> got a chance ;)
>
> --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "John Bravin" <john.bravin@p...> wrote:
> > John Peel or your girlfriend? Time to step up and show where your
> real loyalties lie.
>
>
> [This message contained attachments]
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 12:27:39 GMT
> From: <christone@...>
> Subject: Morrizzzzzey
>
>
> Of course he is irrelevant! Speaking as a once-bigtime
> Smiffs fan, Morrissey has had his time, and should quietly go
> back to the States and stay there.
>
> His best time was very great indeed, but didn’t last very
> long - the cracks were detectable even as early as ‘The Queen
> Is Dead’. That was TWENTY YEARS AGO!
>
> Since then it’s been mostly downhill. Scoring NME’s ‘best
> band ever’ vote (or whatever it was) was momentous, and - he
> practically admitted - clearly the reason that his career has
> temporarily taken off again, but please…..no more not-very-
> good whining ( (c) Beavis & Butt-head), and no more really-
> very-dull musicianship…
>
> Though he tried hard, the Man Himself looked uncomfortable
> and either bored or slightly embarrassed about it all last
> night on UK TV while playing live on Jools Holland. His band
> chugged through ‘There Is A Light’ like they were under
> sedation. Peel gamely referred to a ‘return to form’ during
> the previous week, but I think he was just being charitable.
>
> Enough! There’s so much more going on. Melt Banana – yes!
> And the rest……
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
>
>
More information about the Peel
mailing list