From Phyll@... Sat May 1 12:18:19 2004 From: Phyll@... (Phyll Smith) Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 11:18:19 +0100 Subject: HMHB References: <1083337045.246.74157.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <015501c42f65$a5345850$d80c883e@HAL9000> Does anyone know of an ftp full of peel sessions? - there's a nice (and official!) link to the 1992 Half Man Half Biscuit session here: http://bootleg.t35.com/links.htm I can't be the only person who would prefer thier peel sessions complete with Peel's intros too. Peel sessions albums that play like mini Peel shows would be a dream. From miraclemusic2001@... Thu May 6 19:34:03 2004 From: miraclemusic2001@... (Miracle Music (NI)) Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 17:34:03 -0000 Subject: Join Miracle Music (NI) Message-ID: All the artists featured, range from Electronic to cross-genre. You can download a variety of free tracks (MP3's and other sound files) from this official group. Members are always welcome to promote events and musical works with the other members of this group. This group provides a forum for exchanging information about artists and their music. If you are interested in any free promotion of your music through this group, then simply let us know. Keep up to date with new releases and exclusive tracks not available anywhere else. We have an ever-growing membership and would invite you to join. http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/Miracle-Music/join From monkjunkey@... Fri May 7 23:01:04 2004 From: monkjunkey@... (monkjunkey) Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 21:01:04 -0000 Subject: Archived Peel shows Message-ID: On a similar tip, I'm after an FTP address where there were a stack of recent shows from the past couple of years. Of course, I've reformatted my machine and lost all my addresses ;( Any help appreciated, I'm off to Greece on a scooter in a couple of weeks, and would like some Peel to play along the way!! Junk Monkey From robstrong@... Sun May 16 11:46:25 2004 From: robstrong@... (Rob Strong) Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 10:46:25 +0100 Subject: Mogwai dvd Message-ID: <003c01c43b2a$a8f7e4e0$8e492452@oemcomputer> apologies for the cross-posting, and the lack of relevance to some of you. http://brightlight.youngteam.co.uk/eng/news.php i'm collecting fan-shot Mogwai footage for the 10th anniversary dvd scheduled for next year. please spread the word. Rob From dave2@... Mon May 17 15:45:59 2004 From: dave2@... (Dave Chapman) Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 14:45:59 +0100 Subject: Elijah Wood to stand in for Peel Message-ID: <40A8C217.3080706@...> Internet news sites are reporting that Elijah Wood will be standing in for John Peel during Peel's next holiday: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds14405.html http://www.teenmusic.com/d.asp?r=67823 Dave. From robstrong@... Mon May 17 18:36:32 2004 From: robstrong@... (Rob Strong) Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 17:36:32 +0100 Subject: [peel] Elijah Wood to stand in for Peel References: <40A8C217.3080706@...> Message-ID: <008f01c43c30$12a645c0$6c482452@oemcomputer> From: "Dave Chapman" To: Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 2:45 PM Subject: [peel] Elijah Wood to stand in for Peel > Internet news sites are reporting that Elijah Wood will be standing in > for John Peel during Peel's next holiday: > http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds14405.html > http://www.teenmusic.com/d.asp?r=67823 Peel mentioned this during last Wednesday's show (with the excellent Deerhoof session) and said there was no truth in in at all. Rob From martinw@... Mon May 17 19:15:44 2004 From: martinw@... (Martin Wheatley) Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 18:15:44 +0100 Subject: [peel] Elijah Wood to stand in for Peel In-Reply-To: <008f01c43c30$12a645c0$6c482452@oemcomputer> References: <40A8C217.3080706@...> Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20040517180818.00c35f68@...> >> Internet news sites are reporting that Elijah Wood will be standing in >> for John Peel during Peel's next holiday: >> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds14405.html >> http://www.teenmusic.com/d.asp?r=67823 > >Peel mentioned this during last Wednesday's show (with the excellent >Deerhoof session) and said there was no truth in in at all. > It comes from a joke Elijah Wood made while being interviewed by Jo Whiley and some lazy journalist picked it up as fact. Expect the story to reappear at regular intervals from now on! martinw From adyfoley@... Mon May 17 19:25:53 2004 From: adyfoley@... (=?iso-8859-1?q?ady=20foley?=) Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 18:25:53 +0100 (BST) Subject: [peel] Elijah Wood to stand in for Peel In-Reply-To: <008f01c43c30$12a645c0$6c482452@oemcomputer> Message-ID: <20040517172553.91927.qmail@...> the deerhoof session was last week? bugger, i missed it! > Peel mentioned this during last Wednesday's show (with the excellent > Deerhoof session) and said there was no truth in in at all. > > Rob ===== vacuous pop presents... souvaris, zelega & change at l�hne the wheatsheaf, 129 high street, oxford ox1 4df friday 21 may / 8pm / �4 / 18+ cat on form / dustball / ship's a going down / xahdrez / the edmund fitzgerald / youthmovie soundtrack strategies / help she can't swim vacuous pop, po box 289, oxford ox5 1we | www.vacuouspop.com ____________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html From djhc2@... Wed May 19 10:41:47 2004 From: djhc2@... (David Clifford) Date: 19 May 2004 09:41:47 +0100 Subject: DJ Rupture Message-ID: The DJ Rupture set tonight was astounding, but I couldn't get home in time to record it. Does anyone have a high-quality Mp3 they can provide on CD? I can send a blank disc and postage in advance if that will help, and can swap a generous archive of old shows. Reply off-list if it helps. Thanks to anyone who can help. David Clifford From martinw@... Thu May 20 16:36:49 2004 From: martinw@... (Martin Wheatley) Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 15:36:49 +0100 Subject: From the CMU Daily newsletter Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20040520153621.00c490b8@...> >RADIO 1 TO REJIG EVENINGS >There is some speculation this morning as to what will happen to Radio 1's >specialist show line up following the news Andy Parfitt is planning a >'shake-up' to the station's evening schedules. > >Speaking to the Independent about his plans for an evening schedule revamp, >Parfitt was suitably vague about what that meant for flagship specialist >presenters like Pete Tong, Tim Westwood, Gilles Peterson, Judge Jules, Seb >Fontaine, Steve Lamacq and John Peel. > >Parfitt: "All of those shows appeal to particular musical communities, I'm >really pleased that they have credibility within these specific communities, >but I think the job of Radio 1 - given that we are a national broadcaster - >is that we can't just preach to the converted. What I'm talking about is >trying to arrange the universe of Radio 1 specialists in such a way that it >matches people's lifestyles and moods. Frankly, there will always be some >compromises because there are a limited number of slots and everyone would >like more time." > >At least three of the station's night time presenters are expected to be >'affected' - whether that means the axe is unclear. In fact the only clear >thing about the revamp at the moment is that Zane Lowe is safe - word is his >time slot is about to he doubled. From martinw@... Thu May 20 16:54:02 2004 From: martinw@... (Martin Wheatley) Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 15:54:02 +0100 Subject: Morrissey last night Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20040520155123.02247b50@...> >MORRISSEY PULLS OUT OF RADIO 1 SESSION >Prooving all those years hiding in LA haven't dampened his skill for being >an bloody awkward drama queen, Morrissey had pulled out of a live session on >Radio 1's John Peel show because he found out he would have to perform in >front of 12 competition winners. Admitting he wasn't listening when his >record label explained the competition component to his Radio 1 session, >Morrissey axed the gig as soon as he realised, recording a private session >for Zane Lowe's show instead. The twelve competition winners will be given >an alternative prize and reminded Johnny Marr was the real talent in the >Smiths. Which explains some of Peel's between clenched teeth comments in recent days From robstrong@... Thu May 20 17:36:28 2004 From: robstrong@... (Rob Strong) Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 16:36:28 +0100 Subject: [peel] From the CMU Daily newsletter References: <4.3.2.7.2.20040520153621.00c490b8@...> Message-ID: <004101c43e80$81be87e0$6c482452@oemcomputer> From: "Martin Wheatley" > >At least three of the station's night time presenters are expected to be > >'affected' - whether that means the axe is unclear. In fact the only clear > >thing about the revamp at the moment is that Zane Lowe is safe - word is his > >time slot is about to he doubled. what have we done to deserve that honour? Rob From morriso@... Thu May 20 18:07:02 2004 From: morriso@... (Andrew Morrison) Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 17:07:02 +0100 Subject: [peel] Morrissey last night References: <4.3.2.7.2.20040520155123.02247b50@...> Message-ID: <003001c43e84$7d13eec0$4ad02cd9@Andrew> Yes, it was a bit disappointing, but then again John played one of my offensive content "disclaimers", which was quite a surprise - hearing my own voice making an announcement on national radio, indeed! Regards, Andrew Morrison Email: morriso@... Website: http://www.AndrewMorrison.co.uk ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin Wheatley To: peel@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:54 PM Subject: [peel] Morrissey last night >MORRISSEY PULLS OUT OF RADIO 1 SESSION >Prooving all those years hiding in LA haven't dampened his skill for being >an bloody awkward drama queen, Morrissey had pulled out of a live session on >Radio 1's John Peel show because he found out he would have to perform in >front of 12 competition winners. Admitting he wasn't listening when his >record label explained the competition component to his Radio 1 session, >Morrissey axed the gig as soon as he realised, recording a private session >for Zane Lowe's show instead. The twelve competition winners will be given >an alternative prize and reminded Johnny Marr was the real talent in the >Smiths. Which explains some of Peel's between clenched teeth comments in recent days Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/peel/ b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: peel-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. From garry_latham@... Thu May 20 23:52:09 2004 From: garry_latham@... (garry_latham) Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 21:52:09 -0000 Subject: Morrissey last night In-Reply-To: <003001c43e84$7d13eec0$4ad02cd9@Andrew> Message-ID: Congratulations! It was a really good disclaimer, I liked it a lot. --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew Morrison" wrote: > Yes, it was a bit disappointing, but then again John played one of my offensive content "disclaimers", which was quite a surprise - hearing my own voice making an announcement on national radio, indeed! From parkrow1@... Fri May 21 09:58:16 2004 From: parkrow1@... (Michael Gilham) Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 00:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Morrissey-Marr In-Reply-To: <1085074445.1413.93846.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <20040521075816.65807.qmail@...> I am not writing to justify Mozza's actions. And I think Marr's work in the Smiths was wonderful. However, it's utterly ludicrous to imply that Morrissey is a "no-talent." Indeed, since The Smiths split, it is Steven that has produced the most relevant body of work. Aside from some of Marr's work w/ Matt Johnson and the earlier Electronic stuff; sadly, he's become almost irrelevant. If you've not heard Johnny Marr and The Healers, and find fault with this last statement, please reserve judgement until you have done. all best --M Message: 2 Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 15:54:02 +0100 From: Martin Wheatley Subject: Morrissey last night >MORRISSEY PULLS OUT OF RADIO 1 SESSION >Prooving all those years hiding in LA haven't dampened his skill for being >an bloody awkward drama queen, Morrissey had pulled out of a live session on >Radio 1's John Peel show because he found out he would have to perform in >front of 12 competition winners. Admitting he wasn't listening when his >record label explained the competition component to his Radio 1 session, >Morrissey axed the gig as soon as he realised, recording a private session >for Zane Lowe's show instead. The twelve competition winners will be given >an alternative prize and reminded Johnny Marr was the real talent in the >Smiths. Which explains some of Peel's between clenched teeth comments in recent days --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70/year From vicarage@... Fri May 21 13:53:19 2004 From: vicarage@... (Jon) Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:53:19 -0000 Subject: Morrissey-Marr In-Reply-To: <20040521075816.65807.qmail@...> Message-ID: I think that was just a throwaway joke about Johnny Marr ... don't think anyone would deny that Morrissey is a quite unique songwriter. The new stuff sounds fantastic. He is, however, a big self-important ponce. And nobody likes a ponce, now do they? --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, Michael Gilham wrote: > I am not writing to justify Mozza's actions. And I think Marr's work in the Smiths was wonderful. However, it's utterly ludicrous to imply that Morrissey is a "no-talent." > Indeed, since The Smiths split, it is Steven that has produced the most relevant body of work. > > Aside from some of Marr's work w/ Matt Johnson and the earlier Electronic stuff; sadly, he's become almost irrelevant. If you've not heard Johnny Marr and The Healers, and find fault with this last statement, please reserve judgement until you have done. > > all best > --M From moomin@... Fri May 21 15:10:50 2004 From: moomin@... (simon smith) Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:10:50 +0100 Subject: [peel] Morrissey-Marr In-Reply-To: <20040521075816.65807.qmail@...> References: <1085074445.1413.93846.m12@yahoogroups.com> <20040521075816.65807.qmail@...> Message-ID: In message <20040521075816.65807.qmail@...>, Michael Gilham writes >Aside from some of Marr's work w/ Matt Johnson and the earlier >Electronic stuff; sadly, he's become almost irrelevant.  If you've not >heard Johnny Marr and The Healers, and find fault with this last >statement, please reserve judgement until you have done. >http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/04.gif I find it impossible to escape the conclusion that Marr completely relied on the rest of The Smiths (not just Morrissey) to create great music. During that time he produced some of the most gorgeous, original and concise guitar playing I've ever heard, but in the sixteen years since he's sounded a like just a good jobbing session musician. Andy Rourke and Mike Joyce played wonderfully along with the guitar, and I suppose it's a cliché to say they never got the credit they deserved. Maybe their propulsion was crucial? Maybe I'm talking a lot of nonsense, I'm not a musician after all. Anyway, it's beyond doubt that Agata of Melt Banana is the best guitar player in the world right now, apart from my friend Michael of course. -- simon From parkrow1@... Fri May 21 20:57:21 2004 From: parkrow1@... (Michael Gilham) Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: moz In-Reply-To: <1085165084.802.55089.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <20040521185721.80678.qmail@...> Mozza's a conundrum isn't he? Whilst one could certainly describe him as poncey, at the same time he's unfailingly self-deprecating. Frankly, I think Britain should coax him back to his native land. He's languished in Los Angeles for long enough. peel@yahoogroups.com wrote: He is, however, a big self-important ponce. And nobody likes a ponce, now do they? --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70/year From janb@... Fri May 21 21:05:12 2004 From: janb@... (Jan Buxton) Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 20:05:12 +0100 Subject: [peel] From the CMU Daily newsletter References: <4.3.2.7.2.20040520153621.00c490b8@...> <004101c43e80$81be87e0$6c482452@oemcomputer> Message-ID: <026d01c43f66$8bbdc3a0$a3fcfea9@jan> On Thursday, May 20, 2004 4:36 PM [GMT+1=CET], Rob Strong wrote: > From: "Martin Wheatley" > >> >At least three of the station's night time presenters are expected >> to be >'affected' - whether that means the axe is unclear. In fact >> the only clear >thing about the revamp at the moment is that Zane >> Lowe is safe - word is his >time slot is about to he doubled. > > what have we done to deserve that honour? The new Radio 1 Schedule can be seen here, http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/schedule/july04.shtml Peel on 23.00-01.00 Tue to Thu. Zane goes 19.00-21.00 Mon to Thu. Peel preceded by Mike Davies (skate punk etc) on Tue, Bobby Friction and Nihal on Wed (asian/urban), and Annie Mac on Thu (dance). -- Jan From garry_latham@... Sat May 22 00:54:13 2004 From: garry_latham@... (garry_latham) Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 22:54:13 -0000 Subject: From the CMU Daily newsletter In-Reply-To: <026d01c43f66$8bbdc3a0$a3fcfea9@jan> Message-ID: I can't believe they're pushing him back an hour, again. It's just too late. My only option would be to stream the shows off the BBC site at a later date, but the quality is just not as good. I say lets complain. Start a campaign. > The new Radio 1 Schedule can be seen here, > http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/schedule/july04.shtml > > Peel on 23.00-01.00 Tue to Thu. > From moomin@... Sat May 22 01:04:39 2004 From: moomin@... (simon smith) Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 00:04:39 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter In-Reply-To: References: <026d01c43f66$8bbdc3a0$a3fcfea9@jan> Message-ID: In message , garry_latham writes >I can't believe they're pushing him back an hour, again. It's just too >late. My only option would be to stream the shows off the BBC site at a >later date, but the quality is just not as good. You could set up your computer to record it using a program like audiograbber. I remember when he was on from 12 'til 2am. Or at least I think I do. Also when they were just on MW. And only an hour long. -- simon From garry_latham@... Sat May 22 01:27:58 2004 From: garry_latham@... (garry_latham) Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 23:27:58 -0000 Subject: From the CMU Daily newsletter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I could do that, only I need I new soundcard, as the present one has been causing anything I record through it to clip. Yeah, I can also remember when he was on til 2am, but I was a lot younger then, and I didn't have a job to get up for (nor a girlfriend who camplains when I stay up til 12, as it is). Garry > > You could set up your computer to record it using a program like > audiograbber. > I remember when he was on from 12 'til 2am. Or at least I think I do. > Also when they were just on MW. And only an hour long. > > -- > simon From john.bravin@... Sat May 22 10:05:27 2004 From: john.bravin@... (John Bravin) Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:05:27 +0200 Subject: From the CMU Daily newsletter References: Message-ID: <001201c43fd3$8b356c40$0100a8c0@...> John Peel or your girlfriend? Time to step up and show where your real loyalties lie. ----- Original Message ----- From: garry_latham Subject: [peel] Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter Yeah, I can also remember when he was on til 2am, but I was a lot younger then, and I didn't have a job to get up for (nor a girlfriend who camplains when I stay up til 12, as it is). Garry From garry_latham@... Sat May 22 12:13:24 2004 From: garry_latham@... (garry_latham) Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:13:24 -0000 Subject: From the CMU Daily newsletter In-Reply-To: <001201c43fd3$8b356c40$0100a8c0@...> Message-ID: Oh boy, that's a decision I hope to never have to make. She hasn't got a chance ;) --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "John Bravin" wrote: > John Peel or your girlfriend? Time to step up and show where your real loyalties lie. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: garry_latham > Subject: [peel] Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > > Yeah, I can also remember when he was on til 2am, but I was a lot > younger then, and I didn't have a job to get up for (nor a > girlfriend who camplains when I stay up til 12, as it is). > > Garry From john.bravin@... Sat May 22 12:36:53 2004 From: john.bravin@... (John Bravin) Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 12:36:53 +0200 Subject: From the CMU Daily newsletter References: Message-ID: <000c01c43fe8$b3249c20$0100a8c0@...> I see what you mean about a tough decision. Do you display a ruthless single-mindedness and stay loyal to the music, or do you go all soft, stay with the girlfriend, and hope to be interviewed by Peel in a typically sentimental feature on Tough Choices on Radio 4's Home Truths. There is a third way... Keep the girlfriend and listen to John Peel at 7:30 every Friday night on BBC World Service (648 MW or Digital Radio). If she vetoes that, time to be making the "it's me, not you" speech. ----- Original Message ----- From: garry_latham Subject: [peel] Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter Oh boy, that's a decision I hope to never have to make. She hasn't got a chance ;) --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "John Bravin" wrote: > John Peel or your girlfriend? Time to step up and show where your real loyalties lie. From christone@... Sat May 22 14:27:39 2004 From: christone@... (christone@...) Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 12:27:39 GMT Subject: Morrizzzzzey Message-ID: <85d1ff29.4477c090.81a1f00@...> Of course he is irrelevant! Speaking as a once-bigtime Smiffs fan, Morrissey has had his time, and should quietly go back to the States and stay there. His best time was very great indeed, but didn’t last very long - the cracks were detectable even as early as ‘The Queen Is Dead’. That was TWENTY YEARS AGO! Since then it’s been mostly downhill. Scoring NME’s ‘best band ever’ vote (or whatever it was) was momentous, and - he practically admitted - clearly the reason that his career has temporarily taken off again, but please…..no more not-very- good whining ( (c) Beavis & Butt-head), and no more really- very-dull musicianship… Though he tried hard, the Man Himself looked uncomfortable and either bored or slightly embarrassed about it all last night on UK TV while playing live on Jools Holland. His band chugged through ‘There Is A Light’ like they were under sedation. Peel gamely referred to a ‘return to form’ during the previous week, but I think he was just being charitable. Enough! There’s so much more going on. Melt Banana – yes! And the rest…… From Phyll@... Sun May 23 12:28:59 2004 From: Phyll@... (Phyll Smith) Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 11:28:59 +0100 Subject: timeslot References: <1085249329.1117.75134.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <022701c440b4$92e0e640$4550893e@HAL9000> >>Peel on 23.00-01.00 Tue to Thu. >>I can't believe they're pushing him back an hour, again. It's just too late. It's a bit of a 'classic' timeslot though isn't it - it's how i used to listen to him when i was at school in the early eighties. Retuning at midnight to Radio 2 so i could get the second half of the show in stereo! It does seem later now, but that's probibly because we're all getting older! Then again, The Peelster's not getting any younger is he! From martinw@... Sun May 23 15:46:28 2004 From: martinw@... (Martin Wheatley) Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 14:46:28 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: timeslot In-Reply-To: <022701c440b4$92e0e640$4550893e@HAL9000> References: <1085249329.1117.75134.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20040523144115.00cdf040@...> At 11:28 23/05/2004 +0100, you wrote: >>>Peel on 23.00-01.00 Tue to Thu. > >>>I can't believe they're pushing him back an hour, again. It's just >too late. > >It's a bit of a 'classic' timeslot though isn't it - it's how i used to >listen to him when i was at school in the early eighties. Retuning at >midnight to Radio 2 so i could get the second half of the show in stereo! >It does seem later now, but that's probibly because we're all getting older! > >Then again, The Peelster's not getting any younger is he! Just a thought. I wonder if an implication of this time change is that Peel will be doing all the shows from home (halfway to retirement!) except possibly the occasional Maida Vale show which might need to be prerecorded because of the time anyway From garry_latham@... Sun May 23 17:00:02 2004 From: garry_latham@... (garry_latham) Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 15:00:02 -0000 Subject: timeslot In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20040523144115.00cdf040@...> Message-ID: Yeah, we could lose the truly live stuff. I hope they don't edit them too much: I still fondly remember the Belle & Sebastian christmas party when the drum machine started up at the end 'The Boy With Arab Strap'. (Come to think of it, was that pre-recorded?) I know what you mean about it being a 'classic' timeslot, although I've always thought of it as that, since it was the type of thing Radio 1 would do to a 'marginal' specialist programme back then. I really enjoyed it when he was on Saturday afternoons, especially on a sunny day. I may have to start that again in July. Garry --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, Martin Wheatley wrote: > At 11:28 23/05/2004 +0100, you wrote: > >It's a bit of a 'classic' timeslot though isn't it - it's how i used to > >listen to him when i was at school in the early eighties. Retuning at > >midnight to Radio 2 so i could get the second half of the show in stereo! > >It does seem later now, but that's probibly because we're all getting older! > > > >Then again, The Peelster's not getting any younger is he! > > Just a thought. I wonder if an implication of this time change is that Peel > will be doing all the shows from home (halfway to retirement!) except > possibly the occasional Maida Vale show which might need to be prerecorded > because of the time anyway From john.bravin@... Sun May 23 17:42:37 2004 From: john.bravin@... (John Bravin) Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 17:42:37 +0200 Subject: timeslot References: Message-ID: <005501c440dc$93794e80$0100a8c0@...> I too remember Saturday afternoons, Captain Beefheart competing with the football results - very brave scheduling in those days. It's easy to put the minority music on very late at night, but I can't see Andy Parfitt being brave enough to "shake up the schedules" enough to compete with the daytime programmes. ----- Original Message ----- From: garry_latham Subject: [peel] Re: timeslot I really enjoyed it when he was on Saturday afternoons, especially on a sunny day. I may have to start that again in July. Garry From garry_latham@... Sun May 23 21:48:37 2004 From: garry_latham@... (garry_latham) Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 19:48:37 -0000 Subject: timeslot In-Reply-To: <005501c440dc$93794e80$0100a8c0@...> Message-ID: I actually really like the midweek placings, less clashes with my social life, and makes something to look forward to in the middle of the week. I hope this is not an attempt to start pushing John out. It had seemed that the move to 10pm (or was it actually 9pm, later moving to 10pm when bloody Chris Moyles joined, to make space for his ego) midweek was Radio 1 pulling him in. (This seemed to be confirmed at the time with him doing a stint covering for Jo Whiley). The previous weekend slot at the time seemed to me to be setting the way for his retirement. This was a time, if my memory serves me right, when the weekend was for bringing in new DJs, and semi-retiring older ones. --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "John Bravin" wrote: > I too remember Saturday afternoons, Captain Beefheart competing with the football results - very brave scheduling in those days. It's easy to put the minority music on very late at night, but I can't see Andy Parfitt being brave enough to "shake up the schedules" enough to compete with the daytime programmes. > From martinw@... Sun May 23 19:32:17 2004 From: martinw@... (Martin Wheatley) Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 18:32:17 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: timeslot In-Reply-To: <005501c440dc$93794e80$0100a8c0@...> References: Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20040523183109.00c53280@...> : >I too remember Saturday afternoons, Captain Beefheart competing with the >football results - very brave scheduling in those days. It's easy to put >the minority music on very late at night, but I can't see Andy Parfitt being >brave enough to "shake up the schedules" enough to compete with the daytime >programmes. > You can get that now by listening to Marc Riley on 6Music martinw From simon@... Mon May 24 09:32:40 2004 From: simon@... (simon b) Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 08:32:40 +0100 Subject: classic timeslot In-Reply-To: <1085340816.510.37319.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <897CDF68-AD54-11D8-AE79-0003939767C6@...> surely the classic Peel timeslot is 10pm to Midnight? From we1@... Mon May 24 16:16:20 2004 From: we1@... (Wayne Ellis) Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 15:16:20 +0100 Subject: [peel] Digest Number 760 In-Reply-To: <1085249329.1117.75134.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <005601c44199$b0e90740$12626363@...> > -----Original Message----- > From: peel@yahoogroups.com [mailto:peel@yahoogroups.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 7:09 PM > To: peel@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [peel] Digest Number 760 > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ---------------------~--> > Music that listens to you. > LAUNCHcast. What's in your mix? > http://us.click.yahoo.com/akrq7C/FARHAA/n1hLAA/JPJolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------~-> > > There are 9 messages in this issue. > > Topics in this digest: > > 1. moz > From: Michael Gilham > 2. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > From: "Jan Buxton" > 3. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > From: "garry_latham" > 4. Re: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > From: simon smith > 5. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > From: "garry_latham" > 6. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > From: "John Bravin" > 7. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > From: "garry_latham" > 8. Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > From: "John Bravin" > 9. Morrizzzzzey > From: > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:57:21 -0700 (PDT) > From: Michael Gilham > Subject: moz > > Mozza's a conundrum isn't he? > > Whilst one could certainly describe him as poncey, at the > same time he's unfailingly self-deprecating. Frankly, I > think Britain should coax him back to his native land. He's > languished in Los Angeles for long enough. > > peel@yahoogroups.com wrote: > He is, however, a big self-important ponce. And nobody likes a ponce, > now do they? > > > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70/year > > [This message contained attachments] > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 20:05:12 +0100 > From: "Jan Buxton" > Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > On Thursday, May 20, 2004 4:36 PM [GMT+1=CET], > Rob Strong wrote: > > > From: "Martin Wheatley" > > > >> >At least three of the station's night time presenters > are expected > >> to be >'affected' - whether that means the axe is unclear. In fact > >> the only clear >thing about the revamp at the moment is that Zane > >> Lowe is safe - word is his >time slot is about to he doubled. > > > > what have we done to deserve that honour? > > The new Radio 1 Schedule can be seen here, > http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/schedule/july04.shtml > > Peel on 23.00-01.00 Tue to Thu. > > Zane goes 19.00-21.00 Mon to Thu. Peel preceded by Mike Davies (skate > punk etc) on Tue, Bobby Friction and Nihal on Wed (asian/urban), and > Annie Mac on Thu (dance). > > -- > Jan > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 22:54:13 -0000 > From: "garry_latham" > Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > I can't believe they're pushing him back an hour, again. It's just > too late. My only option would be to stream the shows off the BBC > site at a later date, but the quality is just not as good. > > I say lets complain. Start a campaign. > > > > The new Radio 1 Schedule can be seen here, > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/schedule/july04.shtml > > > > Peel on 23.00-01.00 Tue to Thu. > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 00:04:39 +0100 > From: simon smith > Subject: Re: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > In message , garry_latham > writes > >I can't believe they're pushing him back an hour, again. > It's just too > >late. My only option would be to stream the shows off the > BBC site at a > >later date, but the quality is just not as good. > > You could set up your computer to record it using a program like > audiograbber. > I remember when he was on from 12 'til 2am. Or at least I think I do. > Also when they were just on MW. And only an hour long. > > -- > simon > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 23:27:58 -0000 > From: "garry_latham" > Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > I could do that, only I need I new soundcard, as the present one has > been causing anything I record through it to clip. > > Yeah, I can also remember when he was on til 2am, but I was a lot > younger then, and I didn't have a job to get up for (nor a > girlfriend who camplains when I stay up til 12, as it is). > > Garry > > > > > You could set up your computer to record it using a program like > > audiograbber. > > I remember when he was on from 12 'til 2am. Or at least I think I > do. > > Also when they were just on MW. And only an hour long. > > > > -- > > simon > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:05:27 +0200 > From: "John Bravin" > Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > John Peel or your girlfriend? Time to step up and show where > your real loyalties lie. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: garry_latham > Subject: [peel] Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > > Yeah, I can also remember when he was on til 2am, but I was a lot > younger then, and I didn't have a job to get up for (nor a > girlfriend who camplains when I stay up til 12, as it is). > > Garry > > [This message contained attachments] > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:13:24 -0000 > From: "garry_latham" > Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > Oh boy, that's a decision I hope to never have to make. She hasn't > got a chance ;) > > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "John Bravin" wrote: > > John Peel or your girlfriend? Time to step up and show where your > real loyalties lie. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: garry_latham > > Subject: [peel] Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > > > > > Yeah, I can also remember when he was on til 2am, but I was a > lot > > younger then, and I didn't have a job to get up for (nor a > > girlfriend who camplains when I stay up til 12, as it is). > > > > Garry > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 12:36:53 +0200 > From: "John Bravin" > Subject: Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > I see what you mean about a tough decision. Do you display a > ruthless single-mindedness and stay loyal to the music, or do > you go all soft, stay with the girlfriend, and hope to be > interviewed by Peel in a typically sentimental feature on > Tough Choices on Radio 4's Home Truths. > > There is a third way... Keep the girlfriend and listen to > John Peel at 7:30 every Friday night on BBC World Service > (648 MW or Digital Radio). If she vetoes that, time to be > making the "it's me, not you" speech. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: garry_latham > Subject: [peel] Re: From the CMU Daily newsletter > > > Oh boy, that's a decision I hope to never have to make. She hasn't > got a chance ;) > > --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, "John Bravin" wrote: > > John Peel or your girlfriend? Time to step up and show where your > real loyalties lie. > > > [This message contained attachments] > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > Message: 9 > Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 12:27:39 GMT > From: > Subject: Morrizzzzzey > > > Of course he is irrelevant! Speaking as a once-bigtime > Smiffs fan, Morrissey has had his time, and should quietly go > back to the States and stay there. > > His best time was very great indeed, but didn’t last very > long - the cracks were detectable even as early as ‘The Queen > Is Dead’. That was TWENTY YEARS AGO! > > Since then it’s been mostly downhill. Scoring NME’s ‘best > band ever’ vote (or whatever it was) was momentous, and - he > practically admitted - clearly the reason that his career has > temporarily taken off again, but please…..no more not-very- > good whining ( (c) Beavis & Butt-head), and no more really- > very-dull musicianship… > > Though he tried hard, the Man Himself looked uncomfortable > and either bored or slightly embarrassed about it all last > night on UK TV while playing live on Jools Holland. His band > chugged through ‘There Is A Light’ like they were under > sedation. Peel gamely referred to a ‘return to form’ during > the previous week, but I think he was just being charitable. > > Enough! There’s so much more going on. Melt Banana – yes! > And the rest…… > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > > > From stuart@... Mon May 24 22:59:10 2004 From: stuart@... (Stuart McHugh) Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 21:59:10 +0100 Subject: classic timeslot In-Reply-To: <1085426798.247.53678.m12@yahoogroups.com> References: <1085426798.247.53678.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: >surely the classic Peel timeslot is 10pm to Midnight? I'd have said so. Mondays - Fridays. i've often suspected in the past that some demeaning change of timeslot was intended to push Peel out, and there have ben worse ones than this. Though if you were Parsnip and were choosing a slot for a 60+ presenter, would you seriously give him one even later at night than before? (I'm assuming Peel hasn't 'volunteered' to be up until 1am, though I might be wrong). On the brighter side for me at least, it means I can catch some of Radcliffe (I think) or the first hour of Jim Gellatly's show, and may mean I hear Peel more often as I'm more likely to listen to the show on repeat in a oner (I often come home and catch the last hour or less). Oh, this news item from NME.com perhaps says more about the state of the magazine than anything else, as it fails to mention the Peel show changes. The main changes, which will start in July, are: * Zane Lowe - Zane will now have four shows from Monday to Thursday. The new shows will begin at 7pm. * Mike Davies - Mike's punk metal show 'The Lock Up' has now been brought forward to 9pm (previously 2am) as part of Tuesday night's rock strand. * Bobby & Nihal - Their Asian beats show had been brought forward to 9pm (previously 3am) as part of Wednesday night's urban strand. * Experimental - Every week day there will be a one hour show dedicated to showcasing the new and unusual from the worlds of music, comedy and art in a late night 3am slot. Radio 1 controller Andy Parfitt said: "Radio 1's remit is to break the best new music to the widest possible young audience." S -- From moomin@... Tue May 25 00:52:20 2004 From: moomin@... (simon smith) Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 23:52:20 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: classic timeslot In-Reply-To: References: <1085426798.247.53678.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: In message , Stuart McHugh writes >i've often suspected in the past that some demeaning change of timeslot >was intended to push Peel out, and there have ben worse ones than this. >Though if you were Parsnip and were choosing a slot for a 60+ >presenter, would you seriously give him one even later at night than >before? (I'm assuming Peel hasn't 'volunteered' to be up until 1am, >though I might be wrong). Older people need less sleep! And surely he'll be doing them all from home now? I remember aeons ago when Peel thought Andy Kershaw was being groomed to replace him, and in the end Kershaw was dumped. But with all these digital stations appearing, who knows? -- simon From robfleay@... Tue May 25 11:04:55 2004 From: robfleay@... (robfleay@...) Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 9:04:55 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: classic timeslot Message-ID: <20040525090305.DHJU2927.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@[10.137.100.64]> > But with all these digital stations appearing, who knows? Funnily enough - Lamacq now has a show on BBC 6 digital radio channel and he plays a much wider range of interesting music than on his Radio1 show. For example - he has played loads of tracks from the MJ Hibbett album and Mark has been in and done a couple of live sessions with him on the BBC6 show. He blatantly really likes the music, but mysteriously it doesn't seem to get aired on his R1 show - almost as if�gasp�he's not allowed to play stuff that doesn't involve major label payola�pure speculation of course, but something deosn't add up :-) ----------------------------------------- Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/ From keith@... Tue May 25 11:59:14 2004 From: keith@... (keith hawley) Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 10:59:14 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: classic timeslot In-Reply-To: References: <1085426798.247.53678.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.0.20040525105712.035403e0@...> >Oh, this news item from NME.com perhaps says more about the state of >the magazine than anything else, as it fails to mention the Peel show >changes. Am i imagining it or is NME actually getting smaller and smaller every week? And shinier! With all the free posters etc. they're doing - and general dumbing down - it's really very close to turning into Smash Hits. k From adyfoley@... Tue May 25 12:35:02 2004 From: adyfoley@... (=?iso-8859-1?q?ady=20foley?=) Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 11:35:02 +0100 (BST) Subject: [peel] Re: classic timeslot In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20040525105712.035403e0@...> Message-ID: <20040525103502.6787.qmail@...> and no doubt it's becoming more expensive too to pay for all that gloss. shame about the content though as it's also becoming increasingly irrelevant, and has been for years. except to zane lowe listeners maybe... good job there's comes with a smile and new mags such as "loose lips sink ships"/"plan b" (and careless talk before) and "is this music" to cover the more interesting stuff. http://www.deathto.tv http://cwas.hinah.com http://www.planbmag.com http://www.isthismusic.com ady --- keith hawley wrote: > > Am i imagining it or is NME actually getting smaller and smaller > every week? > And shinier! > With all the free posters etc. they're doing - and general dumbing > down - > it's really very close to turning into Smash Hits. ===== vacuous pop presents... fuck-off machete, querelle & alesiachair the wheatsheaf, 129 high street, oxford ox1 4df wednesday 9 june / 8pm / �4 / 18+ cat on form / dustball / ship's a going down / xahdrez / the edmund fitzgerald / youthmovie soundtrack strategies / help she can't swim vacuous pop, po box 289, oxford ox5 1we | www.vacuouspop.com ____________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html From dr_bigjoint@... Thu May 27 14:54:11 2004 From: dr_bigjoint@... (dr_bigjoint) Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:54:11 -0000 Subject: Therapy? Message-ID: Hi, i'm badly looking for the recording of Therapy? at JPS (06/02/93, rpt. 08/05/93). Please contact me if you have this recording. Thanks From Phyll@... Fri May 28 12:07:42 2004 From: Phyll@... (Phyll@...) Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 12:07:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [peel] Golden Summer Message-ID: <19813850.1085738862879.JavaMail.www@wwinf3003> And who can forget the golden summer of 93 (?) with Peel taking the midweek afternoon slot... -- Whatever you Wanadoo: http://www.wanadoo.co.uk/time/ This email has been checked for most known viruses - find out more at: http://www.wanadoo.co.uk/help/id/7098.htm From vicarage@... Fri May 28 23:18:09 2004 From: vicarage@... (Jon) Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 21:18:09 -0000 Subject: classic timeslot In-Reply-To: <897CDF68-AD54-11D8-AE79-0003939767C6@...> Message-ID: --- In peel@yahoogroups.com, simon b wrote: > surely the classic Peel timeslot is 10pm to Midnight? It really depends how old you are! I started listening as a teenager in the early nineties when Peel was on Fridays 10pm-1am and Saturdays 4-7pm, he was on then all through my degree years so that's the classic timeslot for me... There was something unique about listening to Peel on a sunny Saturday afternoon, it must be said. From willer@... Mon May 31 10:03:16 2004 From: willer@... (willer) Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 10:03:16 +0200 Subject: ISO a Murmur Peel Session from 1995 References: <1085847662.358.55359.m12@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <002101c446e5$ba9ca660$e4bc9dd9@lyngby> Hi All ..I'm looking for this Peel Session .... Murmur 1st First broadcast 8/9/95 In Need Never One Third Dating Fifi Wannabe ...anyone happen to have this on tape/cdr ??- lots of differen stuff available for trade !! yours Thomas W.