From Stuart@... Thu Jun 1 11:24:04 2000 From: Stuart@... (Stuart McHugh) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 10:24:04 +0100 Subject: Kershaw Message-ID: >I suggest that we all email John Peel prior to Thursday night and ask >him to play the same song dedicated to Andy at the end of the show. >Perhaps Bob Dylan, anyone got any ideas?? Something that shows the link between the 2 shows - maybe Ted Hawkins or the 4 Brothers or Bhundus? Peelie will be at home so should be able to find something, and I'm sure if we leave the choice to him (he knows Andy's taste as well as anyone) we won't be disappointed. (I've copied John on this). Stuart From edblackmore@... Fri Jun 2 01:46:40 2000 From: edblackmore@... (Ed Blackmore) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 23:46:40 +0000 Subject: [peel] Kershaw Message-ID: > >I suggest that we all email John Peel prior to Thursday night and ask > >him to play the same song dedicated to Andy at the end of the show. > >Perhaps Bob Dylan, anyone got any ideas?? > Something that shows the link between the 2 shows - maybe Ted Hawkins or > the 4 Brothers or Bhundus? Peelie will be at home so should be able to find > something, and I'm sure if we leave the choice to him (he knows Andy's > taste as well as anyone) we won't be disappointed. Hi John, This was supposed to be a huge sign of support for andy, but I expect mine email, and stuarts are the only one's you'll get. I hope this isn't too late but I've been submersing myself in business economics for an exam tomorrow, even though I'm studying computation. Hardly far I think. Best Wishes, Ed ================================================= Ed Blackmore, 2nd Year Computation UMIST ================================================= please goto 'D.A.T.A. [for a fan]': http://website.lineone.net/~dataforafan/ From edblackmore@... Fri Jun 2 01:46:40 2000 From: edblackmore@... (Ed Blackmore) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 23:46:40 +0000 Subject: Andy Kershaw Message-ID: Dear Andy, To quote the 'Gaurdian' << In 15 years at the station, Kershaw never ceased to seek out and promote new talent from all over the world. Under the dead hand of Parfitt, however, the rest of Radio 1 has become rigidly formulaic and narrow-minded, with a daytime menu of boy-bands and girl-bands to attract the pre-pubescents, followed in the evenings by "indie sounds", hardcore hip-hop and dance music. >> This is just one of dozens of newspaper columns regarding Kershaw over the last year. How can you be allowed to act so freely against such strong public feeling, isn't the BBC a public owned corporation. Is the mention of Radio's 2-4 in you're standard reply email a suggestion that one of these stations might be taking Andy up, or an attempt to distill anger by hiding behind half promises? Ed Blackmore ==================================== Ed Blackmore, 2nd Year Computation UMIST ==================================== From Stuart@... Fri Jun 2 09:34:52 2000 From: Stuart@... (Stuart McHugh) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 08:34:52 +0100 Subject: Fw: Andy Kershaw Message-ID: > From: "Robf" >Subject: Re: Fw: Andy Kershaw >[This message is not in displayable format] Ah, knew we could rely to Rob to not only insult Andy Parfitt but to somehow even offend the email system so much that this happened... >As one BBC colleague told me, "he's the embarrassing uncle >disco-dancing at a wedding reception". Spooky, I think that's how he was described on this list, and no-one here even knows him! Peel DID play something from Senegal as the last record, I wonder if he read an email from someone here. His replacement (temp), some bloke I'd never heard of, was obviously employed to play 'chill-out'-style stuff, he played it safe, fairly Peel/Kershaw-friendly in that he started with Calexico and the Bush Chemists, but really, don't we have Giles Peterson for that already? (One's surely enough!) S From charles.k.smith@... Fri Jun 2 15:06:20 2000 From: charles.k.smith@... (charles.k.smith) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 14:06:20 +0100 Subject: Feedback/Andy Kershaw Message-ID: <01BFCC9B.DEE351E0.charles.k.smith@...> I don't know if people have started doing this yet but it will also be useful to e-mail the Radio4 program Feedback about Andy Kershaw. If they get enough emails they'll do a major feature on it which means a) it will take time for Andy Parfitt to reply, b)He'll have to argue his decision publicly and c) He will be probed deeper than we can. The email adress is feedback@... Charles Smith From Harmesh.Kumar@... Fri Jun 2 15:33:08 2000 From: Harmesh.Kumar@... (Kumar, Harmesh) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 14:33:08 +0100 Subject: Andy Kershaw Message-ID: Dear Reader, I write to you with regard to the recent dismissal of Andy Kershaw from Radio 1. Mr. Kershaw's programme was unique in it's nature, and there are no other specialist "World Music" programmes remaining on the station, nor are there planned to be. Of course, ALL music is "world music". I suppose what we're trying to say here is, "music from around the world that you may not hear very often in Britain". Mr Kershaw's work for the past 15 years on Radio 1 has ensured we DO hear music other than the 'Top 40', from all over the world. Why lose this GEM of a programme? Where do I now turn for "world music"? AWAY from Radio 1, I guess! Broadcasts on this station seem to be evolving into dance/trance shows, slowly but surely.... which is fine, but excatly how MANY such show do we need?? After all, this is the BBC, HOWEVER, this Corporation is no longer Broacasting for the variety of British tastes anymore. More to the point, it has started to Broadcast to Andy Parfitt's obsession with dance music...... "APBC" Mr. Kumar From jmsmall@... Fri Jun 2 17:35:55 2000 From: jmsmall@... (Stig) Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 16:35:55 +0100 Subject: feedback/andy kershaw Message-ID: <3937D45B.B7CFB2AB@...> -------- Original Message -------- Dear Feedback, I'm writing to complain about Andy Kershaw's sacking by Radio One controller Andy Parfitt. The attempt over the past few years to turn Radio One into an entirely mainstream teenage audience driven pop station is nearly complete, with one or two very token exceptions which still display the station's true nature as a public service broadcaster. The most notable exceptions being Andy Kershaw and John Peel, both of whose programmes cater for a wider range of tastes and interests than the entire rest of the output of Radio One put together. Mr Parfitt's sacking of Kershaw means that an entire range of music from all around the world is simply removed from view; Kershaw's dedicated and loyal audience now has nowhere to turn for the sort of variety and eclecticism Kershaw's programmes provided. Parfitt's attempt to turn Radio One into a generic commercial-clone station is exemplified by the decision to replace Andy Kershaw's weekly two-hour after-midnight programme with one whose music content is already covered by Gilles Peterson and others on the station. Parfitt claims that Radio One is "already packed with different and diverse shows". However if he had paid attention to the variety of music Andy Kershaw was playing on his station, and to the legal obligation of the BBC to cater for the varied tastes of all its listeners, he would have realised that Kershaw was one of the few DJs on his station who actually did do something a little different and a little diverse, playing music from a whole range of countries and styles, and providing a variety of choice not available anywhere else. Andy Parfitt has struck a major blow against difference and diversity by axing Kershaw. Kershaw's programme was diametrically opposed to the standard Radio One diet of market-research-based committee-written playlist programmes, "personality" and celebrity DJ programmes, and programmes which limit musical diversity in their narrow genre-specific music policies. Parfitt's decision will help to kill Radio One. If this invidious policy of limiting diversity and choice continues, the station will cease to be identifiably different from any commercial station, Radio One will not offer anything of value as a public service, and there will be no reason for the government not to privatise the station. Since the BBC is the only broadcaster which is in a position to offer an alternative to commercial pop stations, they must not let mis-management of the kind Parfitt has committed here kill Radio One. -------- End Message -------- (cc: john peel, andy kershaw, andy parfitt) From aidan@... Fri Jun 2 20:26:06 2000 From: aidan@... (Aidan Warner) Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 19:26:06 +0100 Subject: Radio One Message-ID: <3937FC3E3AC.BFD0AIDAN@...> Dear Feedback, I am writing to express my very deep concern at the sacking of Andy Kershaw from Radio One. His dismissal is exemplary of the apparent current Radio One school of thought: anything at all different should be eliminated, or at least exiled to unlistenable times. The majority of Radio One airtime is spent repeatedly playing the same few tired, and tiring, records. This repetition makes playlist-time Radio One significantly less pleasant to listen to; the station has an excellent array of talented presenters, yet they are constricted and detracted from by the incessant commercial-chart-pop of the playlist. The nature of the playlist does nothing to promote new music (notably, the Radio One slogan "new music first" was dropped a while ago), or even provide a genuine public service -- the music on the playlist is very similar to that which can be found on any number of independent stations. I'm not opposed to the concept of a playlist, however I feel it needs to be much expanded, with greater input from specialist music programs, so that Radio One daytimes are more varied and interesting, and the station genuinely stands out from the crowd. Those who wish to listen to The Breezeblock on Radio One now have to stay up until 4am on Tuesdays. Seems like a public disservice to me. I don't believe there would be any harm in cutting back the amount of time dedicated to playing music everyone's already heard, so that shows dedicated to new and different music -- *which isn't catered for elsewhere*, unlike most playlisted music -- could at least be aired at remotely sensible times. And I wonder whether Radio One can see the irony of Kershaw's dismissal falling in the middle of BBC Music Live, an event intended to promote a massive variety of music? regards, Aidan Warner tel. 07779 901 933 From edblackmore@... Sun Jun 4 13:40:45 2000 From: edblackmore@... (Ed Blackmore) Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 11:40:45 +0000 Subject: Andy Kershaw Message-ID: Dear Feedback, To quote the 'Gaurdian' << In 15 years at the station, Kershaw never ceased to seek out and promote new talent from all over the world. Under the dead hand of Parfitt, however, the rest of Radio 1 has become rigidly formulaic and narrow-minded, with a daytime menu of boy-bands and girl-bands to attract the pre-pubescents, followed in the evenings by "indie sounds", hardcore hip-hop and dance music. >> This is just one of dozens of newspaper columns regarding Kershaw over the last year. How can Andy Parfitt be allowed to act so freely against such strong public feeling, isn't the BBC a public owned corporation. Ed Blackmore ================================================= Ed Blackmore, 2nd Year Computation UMIST ================================================= please goto 'D.A.T.A. [for a fan]': http://website.lineone.net/~dataforafan/ From edblackmore@... Sun Jun 4 13:40:45 2000 From: edblackmore@... (Ed Blackmore) Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 11:40:45 +0000 Subject: [peel] Re: Fw: Andy Kershaw Message-ID: > Peel DID play something from Senegal as the last record, I wonder if he > read an email from someone here. no, but didn't everyone else hear him say at the end "don't worry, I'm sure he'll be back". I thought people would have picked up on it. I'm thinking of emailing Andy Parfitt and saying I'm not so bothered about him sacking Kershaw any more, because John Peel says he'll be back, and I trust him. Ed ================================================= Ed Blackmore, 2nd Year Computation UMIST ================================================= please goto 'D.A.T.A. [for a fan]': http://website.lineone.net/~dataforafan/ From jmsmall@... Sun Jun 4 22:38:33 2000 From: jmsmall@... (Jon) Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2000 21:38:33 +0100 Subject: feedback Message-ID: <393ABE49.93738A41@...> For anyone that missed it, Parfitt was interviewed on this week's Feedback. The clip is now up at http://peelsessions.homepage.com Dirty love, Jon -- jmsmall@... From netpeter@... Mon Jun 5 00:43:30 2000 From: netpeter@... (netpeter ) Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2000 22:43:30 -0000 Subject: Fw: Andy Kershaw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <8hem2i+9vdh@...> Yes I emailed John during ther show, and so must have a lot of other people. Maybe John knows something, or more likely lives in hope as do we all that Kershaw will be back. Peter --- In peel@egroups.com, "Ed Blackmore" wrote: > > Peel DID play something from Senegal as the last record, I wonder if he > > read an email from someone here. > > no, but didn't everyone else hear him say at the end "don't worry, > I'm sure he'll be back". I thought people would have picked up on it. > I'm thinking of emailing Andy Parfitt and saying I'm not so bothered > about him sacking Kershaw any more, because John Peel says he'll be > back, and I trust him. > > Ed > ================================================= > Ed Blackmore, 2nd Year Computation UMIST > ================================================= > please goto 'D.A.T.A. [for a fan]': > http://website.lineone.net/~dataforafan/ From djhc2@... Mon Jun 5 00:56:01 2000 From: djhc2@... (David Clifford) Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2000 23:56:01 +0100 Subject: Andy Kershaw (cont.) References: Message-ID: <393ADE81.63A5438@...> I've also e-mailed Andy Parfitt about Kershaw (copy below). He's sending out (or getting someone else to send out) generic replies, mine was all but identical to everyone else's who wrote. -------- copied mail ---------- I'm sorry David - it was a really difficult decision - I spent time last week discussing options for Andy K with my colleague Controllers at R3, R4 and R2. as you say he is just the kind of presenter who ought to be on the BBC. All are enthusiastic about his talents, as I promise you I am too. I cannot speak on their behalf and they will make their plans known in due course. The point about Radio 1 is that its audience changes constantly and new DJs and new forms of music are coming through too, this makes demands on the Radio 1 schedule. (which is already packed with different and diverse shows) Something has to give way and we have to move on. Last week we announced the line up of a new Thursday night schedule and I hope you will appreciate the range and calibre (not just dance) of what we have planned. Andy is a loss to Radio 1 but the new series that starts in September will be a significant gain. Thanks for taking the trouble to mail me Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: David Clifford [SMTP:djhc2@...] > Sent: 28 May 2000 12:32 > To: andy.parfitt@... > Cc: djhc2@... > Subject: Andy Kershaw > > Dear Andy Parfitt, > > I am extremely sorry indeed to see that Andy Kershaw's show is no longer > being broadcast on Radio 1. I understand this decision was made by you. As > a listener to Andy's excellent program for many years I am at a loss to > understand the logic behind this decision. Andy's show was original, > entertaining and unique: there is nowhere else on the radio where one > could find such a wealth of magnificent world music presented by someone > so knowledgeable and with such a passion for the music. I would have > thought this more than qualified him for a place on R1's schedules, and > not just the measly two hours at midnight he has just lost. I feel sure > that another broadcaster will not pass up the opportunity to employ such > an excellent DJ. > > And what is his show being replaced with? Is R1 hard up for dance music? I > happen to love the dance programs but I wouldn't have expected any radio > station to restrict its schedules in such an unimaginative way. Because > Andy's show was more of a minority interest show than some it won't make > the headlines about BBC 'dumbing down', yet that's exactly what it is. R1 > got slightly less intelligent at 2am on Friday. Radio was applauded (by > me, at any rate; others agree) for ditching some of the awful DJs who > couldn't care less about music in the early 90s. Do you see it as your > task to weed out those DJs who actually do the job for the music, and not > because they want the sound of their own voice over the airwaves? Grave > mistake Andy. And who, if Andy Kershaw can be royally dropped like this, > is safe? > > With deep disappointment > David Clifford From lorcan@... Wed Jun 7 14:03:00 2000 From: lorcan@... (Lorcan Mongey) Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 12:03:00 -0000 Subject: feedback In-Reply-To: <393ABE49.93738A41@...> Message-ID: <8hldlk+nuqu@...> --- In peel@egroups.com, Jon wrote: > > For anyone that missed it, Parfitt was interviewed on this week's > Feedback. The clip is now up at > http://peelsessions.homepage.com And thanks to this there's now a full transcript on my website at http://www.avistic.demon.co.uk The next Feedback programme goes out on Friday at 1:30pm, repeated on Sunday at 8pm. It would be good if we could get a second round of emails sent out in time of this programme. If you haven't already done so, please read the transcript and send a response to Feedback, but don't hang about! Lorcan From jonriley@... Wed Jun 7 17:13:27 2000 From: jonriley@... (Jon Riley) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 16:13:27 +0100 Subject: Andy Kershaw Message-ID: <012701bfd093$01648cc0$2b45893e@geespc> While I agree with the weight of opinion on Andy's talents and value as a broadcaster, I'm sure Andy Parfitt is right when he says Kershaw does not fit the station's plans any more. If Radio 1 is indeed about "new music", then one can understand (if not agree with) the argument about excluding Kershaw's variety of (mostly "old") world music, while Peel, for example, always committed to ground-breaking stuff, is retained. But - considering Kershaw's distinguished career, unique contribution and huge popularity - surely a definite role should have been found for him on Radios 2 3 or 4 before booting him off 1? It's not enough, as Parfitt has said, to have had a few "conversations" with the other controllers. Personally I feel his rightful place is on Radio 3, the increasingly broad-minded home of serious musical culture. Jazz has opened a few windows recently in this previously stuffy station, and Kershaw would provide a welcome blast of sunshine. He should have a minimum of two hours a week - half an hour every evening would be ideal. And I'd wager that Kershaw fans would then find programs either side of his which might be far more to their taste than what has surrounded him on Radio 1. Why is the impression given - through the treatment of his program in the past - that Kershaw is somehow "not one of us"? The BBC seems (finally) to treasure Peel. The mystery, to me, is why it does not treasure Kershaw equally. Jon Riley From Guy2k@... Thu Jun 8 15:28:36 2000 From: Guy2k@... (Guy2k@...) Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:28:36 -0000 Subject: More Kershaw Message-ID: <8ho724+192d@...> I tried and failed earlier to put up a few suggestions as to who the disenfranchised Kershaw listener can turn to for help. Advise checking out Lorcan's page for latest news & updates - he seems to be well informed. There's a link on his page to a newsgroup where Ian "folk roots" Anderson recommends some courses of action: 1) mail jenny.abramsky@... Parfitt ain't listening, and she's his boss (Controller of Radio) 2)james.moir@... Controller R2 to put the case for giving andy a job. He's toeing the party line for the moment, but it couldn't hurt to show the size of audience Kershaw has 3) As lorcan said, keep mailing feedback@... ...After that , there's only greg dyke. I mailed peelie in a late response to his request last year for suggestions for a regular feature to replace the Peelenium , and suggested that the last 1/2 hour on a Thursday could be devoted to picking up some wandering , lost Kershaw listeners by playing old sessions, or just generally being "Andyish" for a while. Anyone else like that idea? From lorcan@... Thu Jun 8 15:28:38 2000 From: lorcan@... (Lorcan Mongey) Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:28:38 -0000 Subject: Andy Kershaw In-Reply-To: <012701bfd093$01648cc0$2b45893e@geespc> Message-ID: <8ho726+9ndv@...> --- In peel@egroups.com, "Jon Riley" wrote: > Personally I feel his rightful place is on Radio 3, the increasingly broad-minded home of serious musical culture. Jazz has opened a few windows recently in this previously stuffy station, and Kershaw would provide a welcome blast of sunshine. He should have a minimum of two hours a week - half an hour every evening would be ideal. And I'd wager that Kershaw fans would then find programs either side of his which might be far more to their taste than what has surrounded him on Radio 1. I've just had an email from Roger Wright, the Controller of Radio 3. While it's not actually a confirmation of a new home for Kershaw, it does at least hold out some hope: Dear Lorcan, Thanks for your E-mail. No plans to be able to tell you. We are though planning to extend our world music programmes and we will announce more in due course. Hope you are able to hear all our coverage from WOMAD. Thanks for your interest. Roger Wright Controller, Radio 3 Radio 3 website: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio3/ Broadcasting House BBC London W1A 1AA Tel. 0207 765 2512 Fax 0207 765 2511 From d.mckinnon@... Thu Jun 8 16:50:22 2000 From: d.mckinnon@... (Dougal McKinnon) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 15:50:22 +0100 Subject: [peel] More Kershaw In-Reply-To: <8ho724+192d@...> References: <8ho724+192d@...> Message-ID: On Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:28:36 -0000 Guy2k@... wrote: > I mailed peelie in a late response to his request last year for > suggestions for a regular feature to replace the Peelenium , and > suggested that the last 1/2 hour on a Thursday could be devoted to > picking up some wandering , lost Kershaw listeners by playing old > sessions, or just generally being "Andyish" for a while. Anyone else > like that idea? Not particularly. Nothing against Kershaw or his listeners, but Peelie struggles to fit in his own stuff in the hours that he has, so you'd probably get the worst of both worlds - not enough to satisfy the Kershaw fans, while Peel loses nearly 10% of his show. I also mailed Peel when he asked for ideas for a regular feature advising him to forget it and treat the Peelenium as a one-off. I don't think he needs any regular features and don't think the show's suffered from the lack of a replacement. And he did play something by Big Flame, as I requested, so that was a bit lovely. dougie dougal mckinnon (d.mckinnon@...) From les_miller@... Fri Jun 9 10:42:23 2000 From: les_miller@... (Les Miller) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 09:42:23 +0100 Subject: Pico Session Message-ID: <802568F9.0030C046.00@...> Did anyone get the Pico website address? The first one read out didn't work, www.picotunes.com. Not even sure if that's the correct spelling. From andy.smith@... Fri Jun 9 18:00:08 2000 From: andy.smith@... (Andy Smith) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 17:00:08 +0100 (BST) Subject: More Kershaw Message-ID: <200006091600.RAA00961@...> Guy2k@... wrote: > suggested that the last 1/2 hour on a Thursday could be devoted to > picking up some wandering , lost Kershaw listeners by playing old > sessions, or just generally being "Andyish" for a while. I agree with Dougie. Besides, Peel plays a fair share of world and folky stuff. At this point I have to admit that despite mailing Andy Parfitt to express my disgust, and supporting the Kershaw show I never actually listen to it. I have enough trouble finding time to listen to a week's Peel output and Kershaw's tastes aren't really mine at the moment (although infinitely better than most Radio 1 output, and I do remember Kershaw being probably the first place you could hear Asian Dub Foundation on Radio 1). Andy From martinw@... Fri Jun 9 18:31:53 2000 From: martinw@... (Martin Wheatley) Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 17:31:53 +0100 Subject: Andy Kershaw Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20000609173047.00aa4b80@...> Jon Riley said : >But - considering Kershaw's distinguished career, unique contribution and huge popularity > - surely a definite role should have been found for him on Radios 2 3 or 4 before booting >him off 1? It's not enough, as Parfitt has said, to have had a few "conversations" with the >other controllers. The Radio 3 controller has said they are planning an expansion of Radio 3 coverage of World Music in three months time (I heard him being interviewed recently). This is therefore going to happen at the same time as Andy's show was going to end before he walked out in a huff. Maybe plans were in place. Whether they still are we can only guess at. Parfitt may have done him a big favour by making sure the last two shows went out pre-recorded so he couldn't say things which would further mess things up My guess is that there has been a policy decision to concentrate the World Music coverage on one channel (radio 3). Seems sensible to me martinw From robfleay@... Fri Jun 9 14:08:53 2000 From: robfleay@... (Robf) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 13:08:53 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: More Kershaw In-Reply-To: <200006091600.RAA00961@...> Message-ID: <05f773857170960DIAL1@...> > I agree with Dougie. Besides, Peel plays a fair share of world and > folky stuff. witness the Hawaain Guitar thing last night that was ACE. And I won a place on that Cinerama gig thing next week at Maida Vale but I dunno if I can be arsed to go. Seeing as Anita kindly tells me the BBC cannot pay travel or accomodation costs - it means 35 quid for a train ticket and kipping on the floor of someone I haven't seen in ages. ========================================= robfleay@... http://www.aas.mcmail.com ========================================= From jmsmall@... Fri Jun 9 20:38:36 2000 From: jmsmall@... (Jon) Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 19:38:36 +0100 Subject: [peel] re : Andy Kershaw References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000609173047.00aa4b80@...> Message-ID: <394139AC.A6977B33@...> Martin Wheatley wrote: > My guess is that there has been a policy decision to concentrate the World > Music > coverage on one channel (radio 3). Seems sensible to me Fair enough, but you don't get many kids listening to Radio 3. Who's going to just happen across Kershaw if he gets picked up by Radio 2 or 3? The important thing about Kershaw being on Radio One was that the programme could (and did) get people interested that wouldn't normally listen to the stuff he played, and that can change people's lives. I think Kershaw will reappear on the BBC somewhere - if they're not fighting to get him, they must be far madder than I already think they are. But the point is, he's not on Radio One any more, and this pushes the station much closer to complete uniformity. I don't agree with this increasingly narrow-minded marketing-based idea of what each station's coverage must be. The BBC should be expanding, not limiting the range of each station. The implication is that people are only interested in one narrow genre, that open-mindedness and willingness to expand your musical horizons does not exist, when that's surely what the BBC should be about rather than following the commercial model of focusing solely on one demographic. Tigger From troche@... Sat Jun 10 17:10:47 2000 From: troche@... (Tom Roche) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 11:10:47 -0400 Subject: Everything sucks! In-Reply-To: <960636652.9595@egroups.com> Message-ID: At 7:30 AM -0400 6/10/0, martinw wrote: >This is therefore going to happen at the same time as Andy's show was going >to end before he walked out in a huff. > as Groucho Marx would say, if he's stayed a bit longer it would have been a minute and a huff. >I don't agree with this >increasingly narrow-minded marketing-based idea of what each station's >coverage must be. The BBC should be expanding, not limiting the range of >each station. The implication is that people are only interested in one >narrow genre, that open-mindedness and willingness to expand your >musical horizons does not exist, when that's surely what the BBC should >be about rather than following the commercial model of focusing solely >on one demographic. That is very well said, and all I can add from across the pond is to be thankful for what you got, even if it seems to be sliding downhill a bit. Here in the Land of 10,000 radio stations, literally, open-mindedness and genre-crossing are long long LONG gone on all but a tiny handful of non-commercial stations. And those are mostly run by 19 year olds, which is fine dont get me wrong, but with a complete lack of context a Kershaw or a Peel brings to the scene. In the Atlanta region with about 45 stations to pull in, it is pretty much a total wasteland, even with that amount of supposed "choice." I have 24 presets in the car and only 3 get used regularly. All of them tiny hard-to-get thousand-watt MW stations - one in the north Georgia woods playing a rough-hewn often-despondent new-country format called "Americana," .....and two low budget black religious stations "south of the tracks" playing wild-to-manic gut wrenching hyper-speed screamin gospel, almost from another planet. The rest of my listening time goes to .... drum roll please... Peel and Kershaw tapes! tom From hannah@... Sun Jun 11 00:06:12 2000 From: hannah@... (Hannah Mae) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [peel] Everything sucks! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > In the Atlanta region with about 45 stations to pull in, it is pretty > much a total wasteland, even with that amount of supposed "choice." What about WREK? They're 10,000 watts, you should be able to get em in.... I've barely heard them meself (their net broadcasting is *always* broken) but from their charts, they look fantastic, and one of the best DJs ever to grace the station I work at (KZSU, SF bay area) was ex-REK. Are they not as great as I think, or do they just not float your boat? Hannah From martinw@... Thu Jun 15 22:31:18 2000 From: martinw@... (Martin Wheatley) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:31:18 +0100 Subject: Courtney Love Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20000615204114.00abcc10@...> There's an article at http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html which is written by Courtney Love that's well worth reading martinw From Stuart@... Fri Jun 16 19:59:15 2000 From: Stuart@... (Stuart McHugh) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 18:59:15 +0100 Subject: Courtney Love In-Reply-To: <961162797.22308@egroups.com> Message-ID: >There's an article at >http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html >which is written by Courtney Love that's well worth reading Ironically, it bears a remarkable resemblance to something Steve Albini wrote for The Baffler many moons ago (the infamous "some of your friends are probably already this fucked" piece). I think it's here... http://www.markrubin.com/sxsw/albini.html Even Elastica wouldn't pull a stunt like this! Stuart From ivanix@... Sat Jun 17 13:40:01 2000 From: ivanix@... (ivan thomasz) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 19:40:01 +0800 Subject: Fw: FW:ALERT!!! Message-ID: <004c01bfd850$fdce4400$LocalHost@...> ----- Original Message ----- Sent: 15 June 2000 08:48 Subject: FW: > >Dear All, > > > > > >Someone is sending out a very cute screensaver of the Budweiser Frogs. > > >If you download it, you will lose everything ! > > > > > > > > >Your hard drive will crash and someone from the Internet will get your > >screen name and password! DO NOT DOWNLOAD IT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES! > > > > > > > > >It just went into circulation yesterday, as far as we know. > > >Please distribute this message. This is a new, very malicious virus and > not > >many people know about it. > > > > > >This information was announced yesterday morning from Microsoft. > > >Please share it with everyone that might access the Internet. > > >Once again, pass this along to EVERYONE in your address book so that > this > >may be stopped. > > >AOL has said that this is a very dangerous virus and that there is NO > >remedy for it at this time. > > >Please practice cautionary measures and forward this to all your on-line > >friends. > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com > > > > > > > > *******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer******************* > > > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you > are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of > the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. > In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by > reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to > Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other > information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my > firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. > > From jmsmall@... Sat Jun 17 14:09:56 2000 From: jmsmall@... (Tiggles) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 13:09:56 +0100 Subject: [peel] Fw: FW:ALERT!!! References: <004c01bfd850$fdce4400$LocalHost@...> Message-ID: <394B6A94.7BD5B2C8@...> That one's been going around for years... it's a hoax http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/budsaver.exe.html "BUDSAVER.EXE is not a virus. It is a hoax. The "virus" does not exist. There is currently no virus that has the characteristics ascribed to BUDSAVER.EXE. It is a sham, meant only to panic new or inexperienced computer users." Always worth checking out for well known hoaxes at Symantec's hoax centre before spreading the panic. Tig ivan thomasz wrote: > > > >Someone is sending out a very cute screensaver of the Budweiser Frogs. > > > >If you download it, you will lose everything ! > > > > > > > > > > > >Your hard drive will crash and someone from the Internet will get your > > >screen name and password! DO NOT DOWNLOAD IT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES! > > > > > > > > > > > >It just went into circulation yesterday, as far as we know. > > > >Please distribute this message. This is a new, very malicious virus and > > not > > >many people know about it. > > > > > > > > > >This information was announced yesterday morning from Microsoft. > > > >Please share it with everyone that might access the Internet. > > > >Once again, pass this along to EVERYONE in your address book so that > > this > > >may be stopped. > > > >AOL has said that this is a very dangerous virus and that there is NO > > >remedy for it at this time. > > > >Please practice cautionary measures and forward this to all your > on-line > > >friends. > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *******************Internet Email Confidentiality > Footer******************* > > > > > > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If > you > > are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for > delivery of > > the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to > anyone. > > In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender > by > > reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not > consent to > > Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other > > information in this message that do not relate to the official business of > my > > firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker combinations. > Remember the good 'ol days > http://click.egroups.com/1/5531/2/_/522767/_/961242140/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- jmsmall@... From jmsmall@... Sun Jun 18 15:45:18 2000 From: jmsmall@... (tig) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 14:45:18 +0100 Subject: [peel] Re: Courtney Love References: Message-ID: <394CD26E.5371792@...> Stuart McHugh wrote: > >There's an article at > >http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html > >which is written by Courtney Love that's well worth reading > > Ironically, it bears a remarkable resemblance to something Steve Albini > wrote for The Baffler many moons ago (the infamous "some of your friends > are probably already this fucked" piece). > I think it's here... > http://www.markrubin.com/sxsw/albini.html Although to give Courtney Love some credit she uses the mathematics as a base to go on to make some worthwhile points about ownership and the nature of the relationship between artist and label. From troche@... Sun Jun 18 16:42:50 2000 From: troche@... (Tom Roche) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 10:42:50 -0400 Subject: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: ALERT!!! In-Reply-To: <961332357.11208@egroups.com> Message-ID: At 8:45 AM -0400 6/18/0, peel@egroups.com wrote: > 1. Re: Fw: FW:ALERT!!! yes, anytime an undated, uncredited "virus alert" says to "pass this along to EVERYONE in your address book so that this may be stopped" , especially with frequent alarmist use of ALL CAPS, it is a dead giveaway that the alert itself is the "virus." Reminds me of when Homer Simpson goes to the bank to try to cash a junk mail check saying YOU may have WON A MILLION DOLLARS!!!! and the teller says its a fake. How can you tell, asks Homer. Well, real checks don't usually follow the amount with four exclamation points. As for some Peel news, some advance schedules for BBCWS show his weeklt half hour program will return the first week of July. tom r From candidgirls@... Sun Jun 25 15:10:38 2000 From: candidgirls@... (candidgirls@...) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:10:38 -0000 Subject: Photos Message-ID: <8j50ce+pu75@...> For some light relief visit this free non-porn site: http://www.egroups.com/group/candidgirls From jmsmall@... Sun Jun 25 15:27:18 2000 From: jmsmall@... (Jon) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:27:18 +0100 Subject: [peel] Photos References: <8j50ce+pu75@...> Message-ID: <395608B6.AF331714@...> Or don't "For photos of pretty girls taken on the street, public places etc. Especially young ones, drunk ones or smoking. Clothed or nude, the choice is yours. Please no child porn." candidgirls@... wrote: > For some light relief visit this free non-porn site: > > http://www.egroups.com/group/candidgirls From kimhl@... Sun Jun 25 16:08:29 2000 From: kimhl@... (Kim Harrison-Lavoie) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:08:29 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Subject: [peel] Photos In-Reply-To: <395608B6.AF331714@...> Message-ID: I think the appropriate word for this is SPAM. Whoever targeted this list must have had a diferent interpretation of the word 'Peel' in mind. On Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:27:18 +0100 Jon wrote: > > Or don't > > "For photos of pretty girls taken on the street, public places etc. > Especially young ones, drunk ones or smoking. Clothed or nude, the > choice is yours. Please no child porn." > > candidgirls@... wrote: > > For some light relief visit this free non-porn site: > > > > http://www.egroups.com/group/candidgirls > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Accurate impartial advice on everything from laptops to > table > saws. > http://click.egroups.com/1/4634/3/_/522767/_/961939613/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ---------------------- Kim Harrison-Lavoie kimhl@... From jmsmall@... Sun Jun 25 17:31:58 2000 From: jmsmall@... (Jon) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:31:58 +0100 Subject: [peel] Photos References: Message-ID: <395625EE.91239802@...> Kim Harrison-Lavoie wrote: > Whoever targeted this list must have had a diferent > interpretation of the word 'Peel' in mind. That's filthy From kimhl@... Sun Jun 25 18:04:43 2000 From: kimhl@... (Kim Harrison-Lavoie) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:04:43 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Subject: [peel] Photos In-Reply-To: <395625EE.91239802@...> Message-ID: Very well, Mr Pot. I see you weren't put off by the requirement to state that you were over 18 in order to gain access to the information you just provided to the list? Ms. Kettle On Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:31:58 +0100 Jon wrote: > > Kim Harrison-Lavoie wrote: > > Whoever targeted this list must have had a diferent > > interpretation of the word 'Peel' in mind. > > That's filthy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Spending too much calling friends all over the world? Join > beMANY! and pay less each month. > http://click.egroups.com/1/4259/3/_/522767/_/961947094/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ---------------------- Kim Harrison-Lavoie kimhl@... From jmsmall@... Sun Jun 25 18:07:54 2000 From: jmsmall@... (Jon) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:07:54 +0100 Subject: [peel] Photos References: Message-ID: <39562E5A.DF11C623@...> Kim Harrison-Lavoie wrote: > > Very well, Mr Pot. I see you weren't put off by the > requirement to state that you were over 18 in order to gain > access to the information you just provided to the list? > > Ms. Kettle While I'm here does anyone want to see my puppies? Tigs From kimhl@... Sun Jun 25 18:19:42 2000 From: kimhl@... (Kim Harrison-Lavoie) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:19:42 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Subject: [peel] Photos In-Reply-To: <39562E5A.DF11C623@...> Message-ID: Now THAT'S filthy! On Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:07:54 +0100 Jon wrote: > > Kim Harrison-Lavoie wrote: > > > > Very well, Mr Pot. I see you weren't put off by the > > requirement to state that you were over 18 in order to > gain > access to the information you just provided to the > list? > > > Ms. Kettle > > While I'm here does anyone want to see my puppies? > > Tigs > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Accurate impartial advice on everything from laptops to > table > saws. > http://click.egroups.com/1/4634/3/_/522767/_/961949250/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ---------------------- Kim Harrison-Lavoie kimhl@... From cwoodmansey@... Mon Jun 26 00:47:26 2000 From: cwoodmansey@... (Clare Woodmansey) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:47:26 +0100 Subject: Remote Viewer Peel session Message-ID: <200006252253.e5PMrZm10880@...> Anyone tape this? Please?? Plenty available here as a trade if so. Rob From ivanix@... Mon Jun 26 03:44:08 2000 From: ivanix@... (ivan thomasz) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:44:08 +0800 Subject: Fw: [peel] Fw: FW:ALERT!!! Message-ID: <002701bfdf10$52fc4b00$b57a74cb@default> People, my apologies...I didn't know... Please let everyone you know that it was a hoax perpetrated by someone several years ago! Definitely not me! ivan ----- Original Message ----- From: Tiggles To: peel@egroups.com Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2000 8:09 PM Subject: Re: [peel] Fw: FW:ALERT!!! That one's been going around for years... it's a hoax http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/budsaver.exe.html "BUDSAVER.EXE is not a virus. It is a hoax. The "virus" does not exist. There is currently no virus that has the characteristics ascribed to BUDSAVER.EXE. It is a sham, meant only to panic new or inexperienced computer users." Always worth checking out for well known hoaxes at Symantec's hoax centre before spreading the panic. Tig ivan thomasz wrote: > > > >Someone is sending out a very cute screensaver of the Budweiser Frogs. > > > >If you download it, you will lose everything ! > > > > > > > > > > > >Your hard drive will crash and someone from the Internet will get your > > >screen name and password! DO NOT DOWNLOAD IT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES! > > > > > > > > > > > >It just went into circulation yesterday, as far as we know. > > > >Please distribute this message. This is a new, very malicious virus and > > not > > >many people know about it. > > > > > > > > > >This information was announced yesterday morning from Microsoft. > > > >Please share it with everyone that might access the Internet. > > > >Once again, pass this along to EVERYONE in your address book so that > > this > > >may be stopped. > > > >AOL has said that this is a very dangerous virus and that there is NO > > >remedy for it at this time. > > > >Please practice cautionary measures and forward this to all your > on-line > > >friends. > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *******************Internet Email Confidentiality > Footer******************* > > > > > > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If > you > > are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for > delivery of > > the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to > anyone. > > In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender > by > > reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not > consent to > > Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other > > information in this message that do not relate to the official business of > my > > firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker combinations. > Remember the good 'ol days > http://click.egroups.com/1/5531/2/_/522767/_/961242140/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- jmsmall@... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From Stuart@... Mon Jun 26 14:44:32 2000 From: Stuart@... (Stuart McHugh) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:44:32 +0100 Subject: [peel] Digest Number 203 In-Reply-To: <954498751.29492@onelist.com> Message-ID: I've just finished reading "The Nation's Favourite", Simon Garfield's book on Wonderful Radio One. There are many appearances by much (and rightly) maligned characters such as Simon Bates, DLT etc., though they don't come across too badly - having presumably thought what they were going to say before actually opening their mouths. And the likes of Matthew Banister and even Andy Parfitt come out with their reputations fairly intact. The one person who comes from behind the scenes is one Jeff Smith who comes across as perhaps more close to being Radio One's antichrist than anyone else. He is in charge of playlisting, and goes in a right little strop if dj's deviate from this or dare to make fun of any of the records he's chosen. He clearly HATES Mark and Lard, and beileves that they talk too much. However, he thinks Chris Moyles is the bees knees. It's my guessing that he is actually behind the recent sacking of Kershaw, perhaps because he also has a northern accent. So presumably he has some incriminating photos of Andy Parfitt. That would explain the vague answers we all got from him. I'm listening to a woman called Sarah HB (?) at the moment, as Jo Whylie is off on a post-Glastonbury holiday. Must have overdone things, eh. She is utterly utterly LAMNETABLE, seems to have no knowledge or interest in music at all, and of course completely devoid of personality (to be fair, a prerequisite for new dj's at the station). It's like listening to Beat106. I can only assume that she knows someone high up at the BBC (and you can insert your own quotes round the word 'knows' if you like). Though she does read out emails in a nice Home Counties accent without stumbling too much. Not much Peel content here - now, I saw a fair bit of the Glastonbury broadcasts but the only sign of Peel was when Billy Bragg mentioned that he'd locked himself out of his car. Was the man actually at the festival at all? Stuart From jmsmall@... Mon Jun 26 15:36:28 2000 From: jmsmall@... (Tig) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:36:28 +0100 Subject: [peel] Digest Number 203 References: Message-ID: <39575C5C.48110560@...> Stuart McHugh wrote: > Not much Peel content here - now, I saw a fair bit of the Glastonbury > broadcasts but the only sign of Peel was when Billy Bragg mentioned that > he'd locked himself out of his car. Was the man actually at the festival at > all? Aye, and did a three hour show on Radio One Saturday night. Obviously didn't have much say in the content of the live stuff that was broadcast - Pet Shop Boys and Travis (nice lads, you could take them home to meet your mum) ugh ... That said there were a few tracks from Cay, Elastica and some decent Dave Clarke choonage. Stig From aidan@... Mon Jun 26 18:42:34 2000 From: aidan@... (Aidan Warner) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:42:34 +0100 Subject: [peel] Digest Number 203 In-Reply-To: References: <954498751.29492@onelist.com> Message-ID: <395787FA366.6AEAAIDAN@...> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:44:32 +0100 Stuart McHugh wrote: > I've just finished reading "The Nation's Favourite", Simon Garfield's book > on Wonderful Radio One. Better late than never :) > The one person who comes from behind the scenes is one Jeff Smith who comes > across as perhaps more close to being Radio One's antichrist than anyone > else. He is in charge of playlisting, and goes in a right little strop if > dj's deviate from this or dare to make fun of any of the records he's > chosen. He clearly HATES Mark and Lard, and beileves that they talk too > much. However, he thinks Chris Moyles is the bees knees. It's my guessing > that he is actually behind the recent sacking of Kershaw, perhaps because > he also has a northern accent. So presumably he has some incriminating > photos of Andy Parfitt. That would explain the vague answers we all got > from him. Yes, I really, really, really don't like Jeff Smith, having emailed him a bit, he's very stubborn. I mean, might be a nice bloke, but his ideas for music on the station are very depressing. Still, last I heard he's moving/moved to Capital FM (surprise!). > I'm listening to a woman called Sarah HB (?) Yes, HB. Ugh. Used to work on some dance station (Kiss?) where she was apparently the bees knees (if so, why did she go to a mediocre R1 job?)... and the thing is, her own show is pretty much standard playlist stuff with the indie taken out, and a couple more pop-dance tracks thrown in, and they call it specialist. Aidan ---- Sunderland Music Online: http://www.sunderlandmusic.co.uk Frustrate spies: http://www.obscurity.freeserve.co.uk/pgp "William Hague: the world's favourite hairline." - Rory Bremner From edblackmore@... Tue Jun 27 01:43:43 2000 From: edblackmore@... (Ed Blackmore) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:43:43 +0000 Subject: [peel] Remote Viewer Peel session Message-ID: > Subject: [peel] Remote Viewer Peel session > Anyone tape this? Please?? Plenty available > here as a trade if so. > > Rob I 'taped' it onto my computer, so I could send you the tracks edited out in mp3 form. (would be easier if the tracklistings on the bbc webpage were working). or I could copy them to tape and send that to you. Ed ================================================= Ed Blackmore, 2nd Year Computation UMIST ================================================= please goto 'D.A.T.A. [for a fan]': http://website.lineone.net/~dataforafan/ From edblackmore@... Tue Jun 27 03:07:24 2000 From: edblackmore@... (Ed Blackmore) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 01:07:24 +0000 Subject: Millennium Message-ID: Hi, sorry to 'spam' the list. but does anyone here live in the USA, and possibly have Millennium series 2 or 3 on video/mpeg. (It's not released here in the UK). I'm sorry for mailing this to the list, but I've tried everything else, and this series is worth hunting!! Ed ================================================= Ed Blackmore, 2nd Year Computation UMIST ================================================= My Radiohead site - 'D.A.T.A. [for a fan]': http://website.lineone.net/~dataforafan/ From kalk1@... Tue Jun 27 11:03:42 2000 From: kalk1@... (Dr Kerry Knight) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:03:42 +0100 Subject: [peel] Remote Viewer Peel session References: Message-ID: <39586DED.C61EB042@...> I've got it on good old fashioned audio tape already, if that is any easier? Kerry. Ed Blackmore wrote: > > Subject: [peel] Remote Viewer Peel session > > > Anyone tape this? Please?? Plenty available > > here as a trade if so. > > > > Rob > > I 'taped' it onto my computer, so I could send you the tracks edited > out in mp3 form. (would be easier if the tracklistings on the bbc > webpage were working). or I could copy them to tape and send that to > you. > > Ed > ================================================= > Ed Blackmore, 2nd Year Computation UMIST > ================================================= > please goto 'D.A.T.A. [for a fan]': > http://website.lineone.net/~dataforafan/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers. > http://click.egroups.com/1/4633/3/_/522767/_/962059553/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From cwoodmansey@... Wed Jun 28 00:01:03 2000 From: cwoodmansey@... (Clare Woodmansey) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:01:03 +0100 Subject: [peel] Remote Viewer Peel session Message-ID: <200006272226.e5RMQ5g00804@...> Thanks for everyone's replies. I think I've got a copy now. Rob ---------- > From: Dr Kerry Knight > To: peel@egroups.com > Subject: Re: [peel] Remote Viewer Peel session > Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 10:03 > > I've got it on good old fashioned audio tape already, if that is any easier? > > Kerry. > > Ed Blackmore wrote: > > > > Subject: [peel] Remote Viewer Peel session > > > > > Anyone tape this? Please?? Plenty available > > > here as a trade if so. > > > > > > Rob > > > > I 'taped' it onto my computer, so I could send you the tracks edited > > out in mp3 form. (would be easier if the tracklistings on the bbc > > webpage were working). or I could copy them to tape and send that to > > you. > > > > Ed > > ================================================= > > Ed Blackmore, 2nd Year Computation UMIST > > ================================================= > > please goto 'D.A.T.A. [for a fan]': > > http://website.lineone.net/~dataforafan/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers. > > http://click.egroups.com/1/4633/3/_/522767/_/962059553/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Paying too much for Long Distance is a global problem. > Join BeMANY! and Long Distance rates fall automatically. > http://click.egroups.com/1/4260/3/_/522767/_/962122356/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From Harmesh.Kumar@... Wed Jun 28 10:56:57 2000 From: Harmesh.Kumar@... (Kumar, Harmesh) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:56:57 +0100 Subject: [peel] Remote Viewer Peel session Message-ID: Re: Remote Viewer/Kid606.... Does anyone have a cd copy or mp3 recordings of the recent Kid606 and Christoph da Babylon release? >-----Original Message----- >From: Ed Blackmore [SMTP:edblackmore@...] >Sent: 27 June, 2000 00:44 >To: peel@egroups.com >Subject: Re: [peel] Remote Viewer Peel session > > > >> Subject:       [peel] Remote Viewer Peel >session
>
>> Anyone tape this? Please?? Plenty available
>> here as a trade if so.
>>
>> Rob
>
>I 'taped' it onto my computer, so I could send you the tracks edited
>out in mp3 form. (would be easier if the tracklistings on the bbc
>webpage were working). or I could copy them to tape and send that to
>you.
>
>Ed
>=================================================
>Ed Blackmore, 2nd Year Computation UMIST
>=================================================
>please goto 'D.A.T.A. [for a fan]':
>    href="http://website.lineone.net/~dataforafan/">http://website.lineone.net/~d >ataforafan/
> > > > > >
> >href="http://click.egroups.com/1/5978/3/_/522767/_/962059553/">
> border="0" > alt="" > src="http://adimg.egroups.com/img/5978/3/_/522767/_/962059553/468x60bluesta >t0intro2.gif">
 > >
> > > > > >